Things you find interesting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
In other news I'm hearing about trouble in a couple of Gloucester pubs following tonight's Premier League game. The local "football fans" scrapping. Probably not one of them could tell you how Cheltenham or FGR did on the weekend let alone Gloucester City. Yet here they are fighting over MU and Liverpool.
Crazy
 
I made it 32 runs but it was done with ease anyway.
But yes, mathematically not bad <applause>
In a pedantic mood.<devil>

132 runs in 82 balls is a run rate of 1.61
18 balls spare.
18 balls at 1.61 is 28.98 (29) runs. :D

Always a dubious debate.
If the score was closer, they may have batted differently.

On a different topic, MU beat Liverpool.:shocked:
 
  • Like
Reactions: clingo
In a pedantic mood.<devil>

132 runs in 82 balls is a run rate of 1.61
18 balls spare.
18 balls at 1.61 is 28.98 (29) runs. :D

Always a dubious debate.
If the score was closer, they may have batted differently.

On a different topic, MU beat Liverpool.:shocked:
Yeah but I did it in my head :emoticon-0136-giggl

In other, other news, my friends in Helsby were telling me about stray sheep wandering about on Sunday. <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: remote
Yeah but I did it in my head :emoticon-0136-giggl

In other, other news, my friends in Helsby were telling me about stray sheep wandering about on Sunday. <whistle>
Low blow clingo!!! Diversion at its best but a bigger man would concede gracefully and not bring up old history. Then again others told me of some old geezer jumping all over said sheep whilst shouting "****in' wurzels"! Not sure what that was all about.