Things We Think We Think #264

I'm sure you realise how patronising that sounds.

 

Was the reason "knowledge is power"?

 

Thanks. Now do what you said you would do all those years ago and publish them.

 

No one has them. Although HCST, who also don't have them, used them in their FA submission.

 

Usual suspects just feeding us peons what they think we should know.

 

He back pedaled hastily

 

The Allams are liars and thick with it..

2,500 added to the spectators tally when reducing the prices would bring in that amount for real

It's not hard to fill the stadium with a range of offers and 3-match packages (as Lyon do here)

it's called being inventive and attractive to fans

it's called getting new supporters, family and friends in

it's called creating a community

I'm sure there are people at Hull City who suggest good ideas but they must either resign in beffuddlement or get sneered at by the bosses

 

Perhaps I shouldn't have asked as there seems to be some confusion ... although I do agree that there is no point in publishing now, although there was every point then - just a pity some didn't agree.

 

I think it should have been made public at the time - part of the problem has been that many people took Allam seriously and believed his lies, so anything that demonstrated them would have been beneficial.

It's a convenient distraction though isn't it. The lying about attendances was brought up, an attempt to deflect that onto Pearson was made and failed, so quick best mention the CTWD minutes. That'll hold 'em off.

 

He certainly kept well out of the spotlight when he was organising himself a mortgage on a stadium he didn't own.

 

Then that's daft because they're committing to paying a %age to both the enemy and the FA of tickets that were never sold.

Can't see it. They've got that number from somewhere.

 

If I was the league or the invading enemy, I would be pushing for the %age of the announced attendance. And wondering why they're announcing a bullshit attendance.