You don't know me, nor what I've done to try and get them out. Nor do you have any idea of my "success" or "money". I've never been an "online vocal type" as I'm not an attention seeking fanny like you so don't try and deflect from the fact that you were their biggest supporter on here, derided everyone else for their opposite views, yet criticise the Trust for not now doing enough to get them out. I have no idea of what you do in life, nor do I wish to, I just know that in your many, many posts on here in regard to the Allam's, you are a ****ing hypocrite.
Yup. Still don't know what a hypocrite is, do you? You've either done nothing. Or you've done something, that hasn't worked. Either way, great job champ! I derided people making wild accusations, making **** up and spouting hearsay and conjecture as fact. I see why that bothers you. You've quite often exploded in faux rage at my posts, seemingly distraught at someone having different ideas than your own. You've been quiet a while now, obviously busy hatching some ingenious plan to rid us of the Allams, and tbh, I'd forgotten I just pitied you in the past. I'm there again now though.
Muffin wanted the Allams gone much earlier than me and he made that very clear to the club at the FWG meetings and to CTWD (who he actively supported, despite the organisation not going as far as he'd have liked), it turned out that he called it right from the start.
That quote by the football club owning genius that is Ehab Allam should be put on the digital display boards around the ground. What a muppet
Soooo basically he's failed to convince anyone else, and failed to achieve anything? He couldn't persuade CTWD that they needed to go but for some reason focuses in on me? Calling it right from the start is a matter of perspective. If they hadn't come in, if they hadn't invested, we'd not have seen an FA cup final, promotion etc. I still believe claiming you wanted them gone from the start (him not you) is wrong. The membership scheme was the straw for me. Everyone, including you, have or had different breaking points. According to that cockwomble that makes everyone else wrong. But me the mosted wrong. Yet he still won't criticise CTWD for agreeing with me on the owners. And he still doesn't understand what hypocrisy is.
hypocrisynoun [ U ] uk /hɪˈpɒk.rɪ.si/ us /hɪˈpɑː.krə.si/ disapproving C2 a situation in which someone pretends to believe something that they do not really believe, or that is the opposite of what they do or say at another time: Just so you know, I have never said anyone was wrong and I haven't been asked to criticise CTWD. You are a hypocrite.
Aye, you and the chairman of CTWD were very much in agreement on the owners. CTWD was a group of twenty or so individuals, who had opinions varying from thinking they could forgive the owners if they jacked in the name change bollocks, to others who hated them and wanted them gone from fairly early on. You're fully aware that even though overall the forgivers exceeded the outers, they couldn't have been further away from your position.
Jesus. It's embarrassing now. I'm just gonna let you slink off again, feels unfair pointing out the obvious and whilst it's been amusing, it's almost certainly boring the **** out if everyone else.
What was the (hypocritical according to Muffin) public stance at the time on the Allams staying or going? Probably best to just leave this TBH.
CTWD was never an Allam Out organisation, it was just a group of fans who came together to fight a ridiculous name change application. Muffin was well of our stance throughout the campaign and has never suggested any hypocrisy on our part.
CTWD was a bunch of fans, and as such, was pretty representative of the views of fans at the time. Most fans would have been happy if the Allams had seen reason and rolled back on the name change....in fact, there were plenty who would have swallowed the name change as the price to pay for keeping the Allams. CTWD would have been a marginalised minority if they had come straight out with Allam Out at the same time as the initial name change battle. It has been a death by a thousand cuts as far as the relationship with the fans has been concerned; the latest, and probably most damaging, being the membership scheme and now the vast majority probably want Allam Out. The real debate on here shouldn't be the pissing contest of who is the biggest wiseass and who the appeasers, but what can we do together to get the Allams out of the club? It doesn't look as though match day protests are going to cut it, especially as the Allams aren't even there, unless they actually disrupt the game- so, what else can we do?
