id hardly say calzaghe v hopkins was a robbery. it was close but i think joe edged it, he was busier and seemed to land more, towards the end hopkins was looking very very tired. if hopkins had got the nod it would of been more of a 'robbery'. hopkins vs pascal 1 wasnt exactly a robbery as such but i feel hopkins did enough to win, i think judges find it difficult to give wins to fighters who have been down more than their opponent, like in pac v marquez 1.
