Clues to what you simpleton. The offensive tags that Hambo posted were on the politics thread years before I posted on that thread . They were taken away because he cried to Brb. The tags that pnp linked to were on a different thread and probably by one bored person not a team of GC posters or the Scottish posse. There are no Facts with tags they are short anonymous messages . Your insistence that you know who posted the ones that made Stan go running to the mods is not based on fact evidence and you have no clue. I know who posted the ones that pnp linked to.
1. @PleaseNotPoll didn’t provide a link? 2. Stan didn’t have his tag ability removed for crying to brb, he had it removed at the same time I did for posting some funny tags on the Hull board, which was about 18 months ago iirc. 3. As I’ve already explained and given examples of.......and you’ve ignored, there was a point when the forum was filled with GC tags, Dull got his stripes removed as mod of the politics thread in the aftermath. I’ve even provided you with brb’s post ffs. Then again you made a case for Mair ffs, so why should I be surprised at your pig headed refusal to accept what happened.
1. I thought pnp provided info leading to the notorious GC tag bandits , I could be mistaken. 2. Brb ****ed up when he did something to Stan's account and inadvertently switched his tag function back on . He has explained in detail . When he realised this he disabled his tags again and received a pm less than an hour later from him complaining about hurtful tags. 3. At no point did brb blame the offensive tags on GC members . There are some tags on another thread that look like they may be GC related but they could have been done at any time . You do not accept that as a result of Stan complaining to the mods the tags were removed for everyone. Even though the guy that removed them confirmed this to be true. Go and have a sit down love .
1. You were, it was me bone head, and you replied to the post 2. I know and I never said otherwise, I was correcting you on yet another false assertion wee man. 3. Ask him. 4. It just so happens those threads were from the exact same period, pure coincidence I don’t give a **** why they were removed as I couldn’t use them or delete them anyway, and I’ve never passed comment on it. You however, have continually brought it up as it’s patently IMPORTANT to Duncan.
Why do you reference this so often? Do you feel that you are superior to someone who owns a chip van. If so, what makes you superior? You once let slip what you earn. Someone who owns a chip van would eclipse your earnings so it can't be the dosh that makes you think you're better than a chip van owner. The flying monkey obsession that anyone who isn't a bigot or islamophobe must be an unemployed benefits cheat is just bizarre. You've got chips on your shoulders (do you see what I did there?).
He obviously thinks that being a printers sidekick at nearly 50 is more worthy and lucrative than being a self employed chip van owner. He’s a snob mate
Maybe when he’s sent out to get lunch for the rest of the team he thinks he’s superior to the guy who owns the chip van?
I'm currently contracting at one of the world's best known companies you old salad dodger ... you still cooking the books for plumbers.?
Dunno mate, they’ve all revelled in that one. Sisu completely bought it......shock, horror. He even took a swipe at my supposed hypocrisy given my climate change stance, as he decided it was also an old oil burner lol.
That would involve applying a modicum of logic, but whenever has that stopped Kustard and the flying monkeys?
