You talk about it in the exact same way as a conspiracy theorist blames the MSM. Science is one of the most tolerant areas when it comes to discussing and disproving theories. It happens all the time. For example there are already varying theories for the formation of galaxies. Why would the 'established' cosmologists take one seriously and laugh at another? Oh wait - money. Another conspiracy theorist go-to.
Sorry we are going a bit off topic so I won't bother replying about that on this thread again. About 100 years ago when people had babies, they assigned pink to boys and blue to girls. Pink was seen as a stronger colour so better suited to a boy, and blue more dainty.
Hahahhaa. Bobbyd has a low bar for humour. Ironically certain posters who are superstars in their own minds dont even reach that bar
Because they peddle nonsense. Failed students who've developed their own crackpot ideas on youtube to sell to gullible saps like you.
#4572 Bobby never likes my posts Piskie does, he's like the girl at school who fancies you but you don't like her that way kinda thing.
Got to give credit to Kipper to be fair, if it wasn't for his bullshit we might have nothing to talk about other than cricket or tennis.
I'm **** at darts Badboy snooker mofo tennis cricket womens football athletics golf all **** & darts too yeh I like the winter Olympics tho
This the scientific community actively encourage their models to be tested to try and fail them. That's how science works. If it then stands up to the rigour of intellectual criticism and still holds, it can be considered to be a sound working theory. The models of the electric universe have been tested and failed. The response from the EU proponents is that mainstream science is a fraud and is trying to suppress their 'knowledge'
They belong in the same envelope as climate change deniers and the other assorted conspiracy cranks. It’s pseudo science.
