Story of your life maybe?
MoH
I like to maintain my values & principles but yes, I do have a tendency not to waste time on people who spout & regurgitate idiotic bul
Story of your life maybe?
MoH
It’s the middle of the 100th anniversary of women getting the vote through direct, and illegal, actionAlas, it is usually unlawful action that has the quickest results.
I'm not condoning anything illegal but that's just the way it is.
I like to maintain my values & principles but yes, I do have a tendency not to waste time on people who spout & regurgitate idiotic bul
I like to maintain my values & principles but yes, I do have a tendency not to waste time on people who spout & regurgitate idiotic bul
So, now we’ve cleared that up, and realising you only read the first paragraph so this may be tricky to answer, why do you think it is all drivel?
MoH
I think that may well happen anywayI feel as if the trust have missed a trick here.
They should have called all supporters to unite in protest against the regime. Asked everyone who is boycotting to attend the Sheff Utd game to support the team and protest the regime in front of the camera's.
Get everyone there united in protest and embarrass the Allam's instead of offering to engage with the owners which is a complete waste of time.
I don’t think, I know the first paragraph is drivel.
Perhaps you should write them a polite letter as your protest MoH , if you are more comfortable with that
Probably, definitely, maybe, perhaps in certain instances TT....,Bumming? Is that a pun?
No it won’t. What you need to do is adopt a long term strategy. In the 1980s many animal cruelty charities used direct action to try and get animal laboratories closed down. What happened? Not much. Then, they got smart. They began to focus their attention on the people who supplied the animal laboratories with equipment, foodstuffs etc. They bought shares, they got people on the inside and then they applied financial pressure. They attended AGMs as shareholders. Result? A significant number of suppliers stopped doing business with the laboratories. They starved them of oxygen and they brought change to the industry. Through indirect action.
What can we do? Well, number one should be a blanket cancellation of memberships. Not piecemeal as it has been. This will send out a message that there is a united approach to challenging their ownership.
Number two, do not attend home/ away matches.
Number three, and this is where it gets interesting, collectively fund a forensic accountantcy firm to analyse the accounts of all of the Allams holdings (specifically focussing on those directly related to Hull City). We would be looking for financial irregularities obviously but it would also enable us to understand the structure of their business holdings. Concurrently we should look to understand the rules and regulations of the Premier League and the EFL. If they are guilty of omissions in failing to hold the Allams to account we should take legal action against them too.
That really is a rough outline of how I would approach this wicked problem.
And not one law broken!
MoH
We're football fans not the KGB ffs
Really? Good luck in controlling a sword wielding intruder into your house with your pen.
We're football fans not the KGB ffs
And therein lies the problem. Football is now a business, no longer is it a pastime. If you try direct action, it will fail.
MoH
As the Allams have also negatively affected a Russian national, maybe we could enlist the aid of Vladimir Putin in this espionage?
It’s the middle of the 100th anniversary of women getting the vote through direct, and illegal, action
Although the treatment they received on the way was barbaric in some instances

A lot of bullshit in that drivel.
It’s the middle of the 100th anniversary of women getting the vote through direct, and illegal, action
Although the treatment they received on the way was barbaric in some instances

I do not pretend to have the answer but I do know that taking the law into your own hands will not achieve what you want it to.
MoH
But that was not the question posed.
MoH
YesNot all women got the vote then. Looking at Abbott, Thornberry and others, was it such a good idea?![]()