Off Topic The Sullivan & Gold Comedy Corner

Spammers clearly used up all their energy in their midweek cup final

 

I decided to wait for the replay FT before commenting
on what was their actual 2018 cup tie.

 

David Moyes wants West Ham to play like Tottenham:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42650361

The fans will love that! I appreciate what he's trying to say, but he really could've picked another example.

 

If they do, at least their supporters will understand that's
what we like about being a Yid.

 

They'll never understand that.

 

Did he specify which Tottenham that would be, though? Santini, Gross or Sherwood?

 

Raiders v Seahawks.

 

Rumours are building that Javier Hernandez is soon to be moving on. He'd be a great player to have on the bench.......

Maybe we could do a special deal for Jack {Sullivan]. 'Little Pea' swapped for 'Magic Beans'?

"They'll grow into a proper football stadium.........honest."

 

Chicarito must be desperate to get out of there
Otherwise, I can’t see any benefit to the Spammers from the alleged replacement - Krasnodar forward Fyofor Smolov. Apparently the 27-year-old Russia captain wants a move to The Porn Brothers Arena. That was everything you’d want to know about him!

 

Good.

 

Trouble is, this is the Spammers......

‘Indefinite’ ban, which probably means ‘for as long as the media stay remotely interested’........ and the worthless piece of scum will be welcomed back into the TaxPayers Arena.....

Any other club would have erred towards ‘Lifetime’, you would hope!

 

Their fans have accepted the decision with their usual level of grace...

 

They've skirted the issue and fudged the punishment. No surprise there then.

London Council Tax payers probably pay the shortfall on season ticket income resulting from this ban until the end of the season [if it lasts that long].

 

I'll give West Ham a bit of leeway here and assume that they're investigating the matter.
Whichever version turns out to be true will have earned the bloke a ban, but they're probably not sure of exactly what happened, yet.
Time will tell, though.

 

An official club statement:

"After a full investigation conducted by the club, which included statements from supporters in close proximity of the incident and evidence from Jake Livermore and West Bromwich Albion officials, the individual was found to have violated a number of London Stadium ground regulations and will be unable to attend home or away matches with immediate effect.

That sounds pretty final, if it's true....just not good enough.

 

I refer to my earlier comments.......

 

Spot on.

 

@Big Ern ... think the indefinite ban from West ham shows that the "according to the crowd" statements were mistaken (at best) or deliberate lies.
Do you still say he "reacted to something he didn't hear"?

Edit.
This ain't a dig...it is an honest question

I think you took offence at people generalizing about West ham fans which led to you defending the club and fan by minimising the issue.

 

I'd believe the people who were there over a knee-jerk reaction for PR reasons due to media pressure, no one heard it in the dug-out except Livermore, the fans around say it was him being called a coke-head yid, but w/e.

 

Fake views, huh? Figures.