Also reported on City Independant now. I think this is a sign that we don't have the grounds to sack him yet!
I was hoping it was to do with the fact that we was trying to show that we didn't freeze him out and in some form he was made to feel separate, as if we was trying to sack him, he could come out and claim constructive dismissal..... I just can't see him playing after what he has done this time.
Think it is legal stuff. Dont want the gypsy to be able to claim constructive dismissal in the future
Bullard was not on the original listings published. plus NP talking with Burnsie on sportstalk thursday night said that Oli and Ghilas had not been given one Yet and of course Bullard was still suspended. Maybe the City website guy needs to be spoken to about it ?
This was my point. It's not a mistake, they deliberately didn't give him a number and have deliberately changed it since originally putting them up to add Bullard. They've also deliberately done it on the sly rather than making a big deal out of it with it's own headline or anything. They didn't want people to notice. I'm pretty sure it's something legal, just to show they are trying to get him in the team rather than freezing him out.
Well i take your point. If it is legal i wonder if the PFA have told City that the next time JB steps out of line the club can complete the sacking and the PFA will back Hull Citys action. If the squad number is correct then it can only be a legal thing.
