Omitting facts when you well know them is the same thing. Looks like other boards took issue with him too and requested bans, including your own board's mods, probably not such a crazy decision on my part, eh? But no, you stay here cozying up with the Chelsea board over the nasty Spurs mods
I can't really make sense of that first sentence, because (1) it doesn't make sense (2) I'm not sure what 'facts' I ommitted Also (3) Not sure why you've got your knickers in a twist about it really, I just thought it was funny that you banned somebody for disliking comments
Quite enjoying the irony of it really, apparently they only ban for personal abuse but do get precious about someone disliking a post? You couldn't write it could you.
The facts were that it was only temporary and that he was presumed to be drunk so rather than wasting time asking him to stop, it made more sense to keep him off our board for a few hours. Clearly I'm not the one with my "knickers in a twist", since you couldn't post about SeanDCFC1/2/3's ban without airing your own grievance about a post being deleted. I just thought it was worth clarifying the reason we banned a Chelsea poster since you'd typically told half the story.
Definitely sounds like you've got your knickers in a twist to me and I agree that he was making a tool of himself across a few boards, I just thought it was funny that you banned him for (1) disliking comments (2) presuming he was drunk
