Definitely see where you are coming from, and having just skimmed it when you brought it up there are many similar findings. Another thing maybe, before we advanced, all the C section babies would have been lost to natural selection as it were. (dont mean that in a sold callous way towards anyone who's had C Section babies or saying C section means inferior person) Our advances have meant we all retain all the defects in genetics through the generations whereas animals and such leave behind most of those defects as the defect genes die out, if they are unsuccessful mutations. Of course when we breed animals to be pure breeds, we accumulate genetic defects, this I have seen first hand with fish breeding, you need to weed out the deformed fish in order to continue a good genetic line. But applying this to humans.. yarrgghh. Not a good idea, someone might wanna tell the Rockerfellers
Physicists split on ideas expressed in Hawking's latest black hole paper January 28, 2016 by Bob Yirka weblog please log in to view this image A black hole devouring a star. Credit: NASA (Phys.org)—It has been nearly a month since, Stephen Hawking, Malcolm Perry and Andrew Strominger uploaded a paper to the arXiv preprint server that described a possible solution to the black-hole conundrum—they showed a way that information that had been pulled into a black hole could be retained via soft particles. Now that others in the field have had time to react to the paper, there appears to be a split—some agree with the findings in the paper while others suggest that there is still a vital piece of the puzzle to be explained. The black hole conundrum came to exist due to work done by John Wheeler in the 60's and then Steven Hawking and colleagues—first in the early 70's and then later in 1976—it centers around the idea of what happens to the information contained in particles that are pulled into a black hole, once the black hole shrinks away to nothing. It was Hawking that first postulated that contrary to prior belief, black holes do emit something—now called Hawking radiation. But, as he and colleagues noted in the later paper, such radiation would have properties that are completely random, and that would suggest that once the black hole was gone, some of the information carried by the radiation would be lost—gone forever. This of course runs contrary to the laws of physics which state that energy is conserved—thus there came to exist a conundrum. Moving forward 40 years, Hawking and colleagues believe they have solved the conundrum—the earlier work did not take into account the possibility of empty space carrying information, they suggest. More specifically, they propose that soft particles are at work. These particles they note, can exist in a zero energy state, and because of that particles falling into a black hole would leave information behind with them. Most in the field have been with them to this point, it is the next that causes concern. Hawking and his colleagues go on to suggest that a mechanism exists that is involved in allowing the information to be transferred—called black hole (soft )hair, a term they came up with to describe calculations that showed encoding data in quantum descriptions of the event horizon—information would be stored in them, and thus not lost. Some in the field have expressed their frustration with the soft hair idea, in part because Hawking and his team have yet to explain how the information exchange to the Hawking radiation would actually occur. This suggests that more work will have to be done before the idea will be accepted by the majority of scientists in the field. please log in to view this image Explore further: The entropy of black holes More information: Soft Hair on Black Holes, arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th] arxiv.org/abs/1601.00921 Abstract It has recently been shown that BMS supertranslation symmetries imply an infinite number of conservation laws for all gravitational theories in asymptotically Minkowskian spacetimes. These laws require black holes to carry a large amount of soft (i.e. zero-energy) supertranslation hair. The presence of a Maxwell field similarly implies soft electric hair. This paper gives an explicit description of soft hair in terms of soft gravitons or photons on the black hole horizon, and shows that complete information about their quantum state is stored on a holographic plate at the future boundary of the horizon. Charge conservation is used to give an infinite number of exact relations between the evaporation products of black holes which have different soft hair but are otherwise identical. It is further argued that soft hair which is spatially localized to much less than a Planck length cannot be excited in a physically realizable process, giving an effective number of soft degrees of freedom proportional to the horizon area in Planck units. Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-physicists-ideas-hawking-latest-black.html#jCp Good article, am glad someone pointed out the impossibility in Hawking's work that claimed information is just "lost" as with many other parts of his theory on everything defied the laws of physics. Never head of "soft particles" before, sounds like it was just made up to save a theory, I needs to reads more
C section babies aren't genetically weak by definition though. C sections are carried out as emergencies for various different reasons and these days celebs and the like choose a sunroof delivery to protect their snatch.
yes that is true. her first was an emergency as shes got some sort of inverted womb long cervew or something and could not give birth naturally and it became an emergency. Tried second time but they cut it short early enough and went c section. I do think there is a lot of doctors forcing c sections and then yes rich biatches doing it for other reasons. but whether some strugglers who would have died in birth then go on to be weak adults i don't know. I only read theres higher cases or certain things that do seem to relate to immune systems and metabolism etc.
It confuses genetic weakness with the most dangerous act in a child's (or it's mother's) life i.e. birth Issues in childbirth aren't related to genetic disorders, they're issues with the process of childbirth. Unless the kid has a head like a medicine ball like, and then you could maybe make a correlation. I can get the immune system link albeit it's probably rather tenuous
true. not 100% but yes a lot of it is down to the mother's genes and her design like the example i quoted, down to life style (fat women/ lazy soft lasses, rich ****s), down to negligence or just plain bad luck. It is on its face a miracle it works. One the immune stuff... it was a bit of a stretch. it was a coming for people analysing poo and anyone who does that is very odd in my view
For me it sounds like how guys like Einstein decided that they wanted things to be a way so they worked really hard to make it that way. Hawking wants people to be able to do stuff with black holes so he's working hard to prove there a way.
Man made laws based on current knowledge, the "laws of physics" are only laws until they are broken or we find something that doesn't conform.
Agree there, but even then there is great resistance to new findings in the laws of physics because so many have spent more than half their lives working on theories that depend on those laws not being invalidated. Case in point, Kirchhoff's law.. which is theory, is still considered law. Especially concerning black body radiation equilibrium. he claims that a thermal equilibrium will occur inside a cavity no matter what the cavity is made from. This has been invalidated in the lab There are so many theories that depend on that law. The law is also incorporated into Plancks law, which is significant for quantum physics. The Solar model also depends on it. It cannot be right if Kirchhoff's law is wrong on thermal equilibrium You can imagine how many scientists have worked that for decades, including the people who peer review others, would react to that. Asking them to believe these new findings and accept them as valid is asking them to admit they have wasted their careers, and they at 40 50 60 have no time left to work the new problem. If we lived to be 500, this would be less of a problem Max Planck: "In science people tenaciously hold onto ideas even if they have been falsified by the evidence" I think there is another scientific field this quote applies to
When I was talking about genes and natural selection I was taking about the mother needing the C section, nothing to do with the baby.
my kids were breast fed as soon as we got up to a ward. When you breast feed as far as I remember herself telling me, it is not only milk and bacteria, it's antibodies and other stuff that protects against germs. The Obesity is an odd one, I am always of the (uneducated) opinion that you can't be fat if you are not putting the wrong and excessive food into your body. I mean there is a range of sizes but proper obesity, I don't think anyone can be "born" with that, unless they have underlying medical issues like thyroid problems. There are many emotional and neurological disorders and even chemicals that can make you want to eat more as far as I know
Hypothyroidism. This is a condition where the thyroid gland, located in the neck, produces too little thyroid hormone. Thyroid hormone regulates our metabolism. So too little hormone slows the metabolism and often causes weight gain. If your doctor suspects thyroid disease as a cause of your obesity, he or she may perform blood tests to check your hormone levels. Anyone with larger than normal kids should get then checked out for this, it is not that uncommon to have this and I think Ireland has pretty high rates of this condition which is linked to too much Fluoride as well as other causes
