This thread is a great idea and is a clear sign of “concern” over our form and results.
Although I personally like the 4-2-3-1 formation, I would stick with the three centre backs system as it works. We tend to get get over run in midfield when we play two strikers, so would stick with one. Thus we have a 3-5-1 formation (or 3-2-3-1).
I generally prefer our style when we press high and attack on the break, rather than maintain possession. Probably as we tend to lose the ball and are open to the counter attack.
With the 3-5-1 formation the width is provided by the wingbacks who also have to defend the channels. Here we have limited success but Albert shows us what us possible when played well.
My thoughts are to play this 3-5-1 system for the majority of the games, but to potentially consider a 4-2-3-1 foe when we want to be more defensive. The issue here is who will be the full backs and who will give us the width in attacks.
Hi Ski! I see why you prefer 4 2 3 1 to the other formations you mention. All the others only have 9 outfield players so I do agree! Or am I drunk.
I'm totally lost about Barbet being slow. He is by far our quickest CB over short distances, and why he is able to regularly makes amazing goal saving tackles and blocks when it looks like the striker has only to beat Dieng to score. For me he is by far our best consistent central defender, can play Back or WB, never injured and no wonder Warburton plays him every game. My player of the season last season by a country mile.
Think I put this up before on another thread but my team would also be :
Dieng
Dickie Jordi Barbet
Adomah Field Johansen Wallace
Willock Chair
Dykes
Or Chair making a 5 man midfield the most forward one.
When they are all fit.
Think someone else has put up the same. Dozzell showed he can fill Field's position if he can continue that form he showed against at Forest. Moses is good back up for either WB, Kakay can do a job at RWB and McCallum at LWB if we can get him fit. Amos would provide a different pressing option to Chair or Willock when he's 100%', and Austin of course for Dykes. Think we are short at DCM without a fit Field, at CB if Jordi is out again, not convinced by Dunne yet and we have noone else qualified, though Kakay and Ball could play there. Duke McKenna looks promising. Still think we can make top 6 if we can get our attacking game zipping forward again and dont get too many injuries.

