The QPR Tactics Discussion Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
This thread is a great idea and is a clear sign of “concern” over our form and results.

Although I personally like the 4-2-3-1 formation, I would stick with the three centre backs system as it works. We tend to get get over run in midfield when we play two strikers, so would stick with one. Thus we have a 3-5-1 formation (or 3-2-3-1).

I generally prefer our style when we press high and attack on the break, rather than maintain possession. Probably as we tend to lose the ball and are open to the counter attack.

With the 3-5-1 formation the width is provided by the wingbacks who also have to defend the channels. Here we have limited success but Albert shows us what us possible when played well.

My thoughts are to play this 3-5-1 system for the majority of the games, but to potentially consider a 4-2-3-1 foe when we want to be more defensive. The issue here is who will be the full backs and who will give us the width in attacks.

Hi Ski! I see why you prefer 4 2 3 1 to the other formations you mention. All the others only have 9 outfield players so I do agree! Or am I drunk.

I'm totally lost about Barbet being slow. He is by far our quickest CB over short distances, and why he is able to regularly makes amazing goal saving tackles and blocks when it looks like the striker has only to beat Dieng to score. For me he is by far our best consistent central defender, can play Back or WB, never injured and no wonder Warburton plays him every game. My player of the season last season by a country mile.

Think I put this up before on another thread but my team would also be :
Dieng
Dickie Jordi Barbet
Adomah Field Johansen Wallace
Willock Chair
Dykes

Or Chair making a 5 man midfield the most forward one.

When they are all fit.

Think someone else has put up the same. Dozzell showed he can fill Field's position if he can continue that form he showed against at Forest. Moses is good back up for either WB, Kakay can do a job at RWB and McCallum at LWB if we can get him fit. Amos would provide a different pressing option to Chair or Willock when he's 100%', and Austin of course for Dykes. Think we are short at DCM without a fit Field, at CB if Jordi is out again, not convinced by Dunne yet and we have noone else qualified, though Kakay and Ball could play there. Duke McKenna looks promising. Still think we can make top 6 if we can get our attacking game zipping forward again and dont get too many injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awjm and Trammers
Hi Ski! I see why you prefer 4 2 3 1 to the other formations you mention. All the others only have 9 outfield players so I do agree! Or am I drunk.

I'm totally lost about Barbet being slow. He is by far our quickest CB over short distances, and why he is able to regularly makes amazing goal saving tackles and blocks when it looks like the striker has only to beat Dieng to score. For me he is by far our best consistent central defender, can play Back or WB, never injured and no wonder Warburton plays him every game. My player of the season last season by a country mile.

Think I put this up before on another thread but my team would also be :
Dieng
Dickie Jordi Barbet
Adomah Field Johansen Wallace
Willock Chair
Dykes

Or Chair making a 5 man midfield the most forward one.

When they are all fit.

Think someone else has put up the same. Dozzell showed he can fill Field's position if he can continue that form he showed against at Forest. Moses is good back up for either WB, Kakay can do a job at RWB and McCallum at LWB if we can get him fit. Amos would provide a different pressing option to Chair or Willock when he's 100%', and Austin of course for Dykes. Think we are short at DCM without a fit Field, at CB if Jordi is out again, not convinced by Dunne yet and we have noone else qualified, though Kakay and Ball could play there. Duke McKenna looks promising. Still think we can make top 6 if we can get our attacking game zipping forward again and dont get too many injuries.

I think that's our strongest line up in that formation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
Hi Ski! I see why you prefer 4 2 3 1 to the other formations you mention. All the others only have 9 outfield players so I do agree! Or am I drunk.

I'm totally lost about Barbet being slow. He is by far our quickest CB over short distances, and why he is able to regularly makes amazing goal saving tackles and blocks when it looks like the striker has only to beat Dieng to score. For me he is by far our best consistent central defender, can play Back or WB, never injured and no wonder Warburton plays him every game. My player of the season last season by a country mile.

Think I put this up before on another thread but my team would also be :
Dieng
Dickie Jordi Barbet
Adomah Field Johansen Wallace
Willock Chair
Dykes

Or Chair making a 5 man midfield the most forward one.

When they are all fit.

Think someone else has put up the same. Dozzell showed he can fill Field's position if he can continue that form he showed against at Forest. Moses is good back up for either WB, Kakay can do a job at RWB and McCallum at LWB if we can get him fit. Amos would provide a different pressing option to Chair or Willock when he's 100%', and Austin of course for Dykes. Think we are short at DCM without a fit Field, at CB if Jordi is out again, not convinced by Dunne yet and we have noone else qualified, though Kakay and Ball could play there. Duke McKenna looks promising. Still think we can make top 6 if we can get our attacking game zipping forward again and dont get too many injuries.
You're not the only one with that opinion about Barbet. I think a lot of people have been awe struck by Dickie's runs and his goals (that have dried up). But, as you say, Barbet is by far the player who has ultimately prevented the most goals, this season and probably a good chunk of last season. And preventing goals is what defenders are for! You also rightly point out that he's the fastest at the back.

Dickie gets things wrong, just like the others. But he has not been in form (although is maybe returning to form now?). I actually think that all 4 of our CBs are good players, which is why I think the others can cover a Dickie short spell on the bench to get his head together (which may be irrelevant now if Dickie is returning to form). I don't think we have an issue with the talent in that 4, but the pace isn't there and I believe Warburton is not getting the best out of them. In that respect, maybe a different formation is the right call? Sadly, we've transferred our way into a corner as we haven't looked to find proper fullbacks, making it hard to now play anything but 3 at the back.

If we did go back to 4, I'd make it McCallum - Dickie - Barbet - Wallace. Until certain players are back, I'm not sure Kakay and Odubaju can hold that formation well enough?

For me, having Adomah on the pitch is essential, until something else can change. We need to provide crosses, because walking the ball into the opposition box isn't working (duh!). We just need to make defences sweat and work, rather than allowing them back into position and to get a breather.

With that said, we may be able to play without Adomah effectively if Warburton gives specific instructions to Chair, Willock and Johansen to have an eagle eye on when the striker/s call for the ball, and to take a chance on putting balls through, either on the ground or by looped through balls. We play too safe and try to keep possession to much in the final third.

Mods, can we not make this a sticky? My ambition for the thread was for it to be an ever changing thing, where we discuss tactics in response to how things unfold over the season (because I'm sure Warburton will be trying different things throughout the campaign, as well as there being injuries and other things that change our thoughts on best tactics).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
How about trying this out against Cardiff - wouldn't know what's hit them!

You must log in or register to see media
That's actually brilliant. Wouldn't work all the time, though.

On a serious note, what does everyone reckon for tonight's match, tactics wise? We surely have one of the physically weakest teams in the league. Cardiff typically like to go in strong.

Perhaps this calls for a more direct form of defending? Perhaps 4 at the back with Ball in front (my thinking here is that Dom Ball would be an additional player to get up for headers/aerial attacks when Cardiff do their long ball routine). Kakay and Odubajo is RB and LB for a bit more of a physical tussle?

Kakay - Dickie - Barbet - Odubaju

Ball

And then:

Johansen

Adomah - Chair - Willock

Dykes
Thoughts?
 
I'd prefer to have Dunnne in a back 3 with Jordi out. WB's Albert and Moses. Dozzell partnered Stefan better than Ball or anyone else this season so I'd play him again. He did ok in the physical battles too. Chair and Willock in front of them. With Dykes up front if he's ok, otherwise Austin.
 
I'd prefer to have Dunnne in a back 3 with Jordi out. WB's Albert and Moses. Dozzell partnered Stefan better than Ball or anyone else this season so I'd play him again. He did ok in the physical battles too. Chair and Willock in front of them. With Dykes up front if he's ok, otherwise Austin.

Yep, same. Maybe give Gray another chance as he's more mobile than Austin, although he's been awful thus far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sb_73
Yep, same. Maybe give Gray another chance as he's more mobile than Austin, although he's been awful thus far.
Hopefully Dykes is fit. Otherwise, for me, it’s a start for Austin over Gray - 45 mins each. Just need 1 goal from each of them please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
I'd be surprised if Lyndon starts tonight, more likely keeping him for Blackpool, apparently team and several supporters are going direct from Cardiff to Blackpool, making a very looooooong weekend of it..... the fans not the team...... well hopefully not the team
 
  • Like
Reactions: awjm
I'd be surprised if Lyndon starts tonight, more likely keeping him for Blackpool, apparently team and several supporters are going direct from Cardiff to Blackpool, making a very looooooong weekend of it..... the fans not the team...... well hopefully not the team
I understand your desire to keep Dykes fresh but at what point did we move into this frame of mind where players can only play once a week without running them into the ground?

Why can't Dykes start every single game because he is our best striker?

In fact, why can't we start with our absolute best 11 and best system in every game, control the match, get ahead and then bring in fringe players with a point to prove?

Am I missing something?

P.s. I don't mean to sound so critical of your view but more the illusion that Warburton's obsession with tinkering has brought on. I feel we've started to buy in to the idea that you can't get through a Championship season without changing half your squad each game. Why are other more successful teams keeping their best side in each match bar injuries?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoop-Leif
I understand your desire to keep Dykes fresh but at what point did we move into this frame of mind where players can only play once a week without running them into the ground?

Why can't Dykes start every single game because he is our best striker?

In fact, why can't we start with our absolute best 11 and best system in every game, control the match, get ahead and then bring in fringe players with a point to prove?

Am I missing something?

P.s. I don't mean to sound so critical of your view but more the illusion that Warburton's obsession with tinkering has brought on. I feel we've started to buy in to the idea that you can't get through a Championship season without changing half your squad each game. Why are other more successful teams keeping their best side in each match bar injuries?

The bit you were missing ajwm was that Dykes had his foot in a precautionary boot thing over the weekend and was only passed fit to play yesterday morning. So it was a bit of a surprise he played...and played for so long too ( probably only because Gray got injured).

We accuse Warbs of tinkering, but we didn't know Chair had Covid, or that Charlie's much loved grand mother was dying.

I do not think he tinkers as much as some people think he does

Dykes might not make Saturday, which might be a pain if Gray is out too...and Willock has a personal problem..
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo and awjm
How many fit players do we have at present?! :emoticon-0108-speec
Oh at least one or two.

So the gossip I have is ...Thomas, Field, Owens, Wallace are working their way back...Amos obviously is also being careful.
DeWisj and McCallum are out for a few weeks.

Dykes is carrying a knock to his foot

Last night Gray and Chair finished up with knocks and possibly Johansen although that might have been a bit put on

Willock has a personal problem

So we have 12 possible first teamers carrying some sort of problem.

And we have a small squad.. So Saturdays team from people I think are fully fit (+ Amos)

Dieng
Dickie, Dunne, Barbet,
Moses Dozzell, Ball, Kakay
Amos, Adomeh
Austin
 
  • Like
Reactions: awjm and Hoop-Leif