"The Project"

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
What, rather than from oil reserves?

FFP 2.0 is supposed to address that........I know, I know. It's down to appetite to enforce the intention of the legislation. The recent re-opening of the PSG enquiry seems to indicate that it's not going to be as easy to get away with financial doping but we shall see.

The limit of an annual net spend of 100m Euro's and the number of outward player loans being limited to 6, will change things in favour of some clubs. Given our financing, we should be a beneficiary.
 
FFP 2.0 is supposed to address that........I know, I know. It's down to appetite to enforce the intention of the legislation. The recent re-opening of the PSG enquiry seems to indicate that it's not going to be as easy to get away with financial doping but we shall see.

The limit of an annual net spend of 100m Euro's and the number of outward player loans being limited to 6, will change things in favour of some clubs. Given our financing, we should be a beneficiary.

Points deductions for offenders might help, fines are pointless.
 
Points deductions for offenders might help, fines are pointless.

Absolutely. There are lots of problems. There's a new sheriff in Aleksander Čeferin as President of UEFA. He's a lawyer and specialises in sport related matters.

It shouldn't take long to see whether he's part of the solution or part of the problem. The suggestion is that he's for the smaller clubs and countries and that looks possible. I'm counting no chickens as yet.