You create your own arguments so stop being a bairn and blaming other posters; there are frequently far, far worse than my infrequent responses to your circular ****e, yet you do and say nothing - except when you join in with them. Maybe if you tried posting something objective to discredit the media rumour that you detest being repeated (have you ever repeated media rumour on here?), other than your subjective opinion, you just might be be able to take the moral high-ground you so obviously crave.
These strawmen you keep trying to build, any chance you could let them post? They have to be more interesting and less pointless than you.
I think most people have worked out it probably ly isn't. The issue is more those trying like hell ot to discuss that part of it. No doubt there'll be more similar dubious bits of gossip trying to be facts in another thread and the tedious insults and diversions will start again.
I spoke to Mike yesterday, they were definitely led to believe that there was some merit in the story in The Sun, or more accurately, misled. I've no idea who by, so I've no idea how much credence they should have given that information, but I'm sure they didn't make it up.
Who is Mike? Is he the one that got a few things wrong not so long back and on that occasion back pedalled on his sources, saying he was just reposting a rumour?
Sports reporter at Radio Humberside. He ran a story about Snodgrass being out until Christmas, which looks to have been wrong and there could have been others, but nothing particularly springs to mind.
October... http://www.hullcitytigers.com/news/article/snodgrass-delighted-with-progress-2532632.aspx?
http://www.footballeconomy.com/content/hull-hopeful-name-change the club are on full propaganda mode ahead of saturday
Full propaganda mode!!! What, a piece in an obscure publication no one's heard of. ****ing get a life
I was being sarcastic you silly **** although you're too thick to grasp it - in future i'll post explanations so it penetrates you're thick head
