The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I only realised this morning that Callum Wilson is suspended for Bmouth tomorrow (and at the weekend too).

Unless King passes a fitness test, they'll be going into arguably their biggest match since promotion, with just Solanke and Surridge. 1 PL goal and 4 Championship goals between them.

PS. How does a striker manage to pick up 10 yellow cards? Not a side of Wilson's game I'd previously realised existed.
 
Shaw looked a tad offside there, but presumably VAR didn’t look back the whole 5 seconds to that phase.

That decision is outrageous! When goals have been disallowed because a toe was in front how on earth can they say Shaw was onside? As for the ball bouncing out of play earlier .....
I’d love to have seen the row if it had been given against Man U
 
That decision is outrageous! When goals have been disallowed because a toe was in front how on earth can they say Shaw was onside? As for the ball bouncing out of play earlier .....
I’d love to have seen the row if it had been given against Man U
Crazy. The ball wouldn’t have got to Pogba without Shaw cutting it back, so Fernandes wouldn’t have scored. They didn’t even appear to check for offside, which arguably is the one concrete thing VAR can be used for objectively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davecg69
Crazy. The ball wouldn’t have got to Pogba without Shaw cutting it back, so Fernandes wouldn’t have scored. They didn’t even appear to check for offside, which arguably is the one concrete thing VAR can be used for objectively.

Exactly! So what is going on? Bet they’d have checked snd checked it if Brighton had scored like that. Makes me totally uninterested now ....
 
Just because Sky didn't show it, doesn't mean that VAR didn't review it. People are jumping to conclusions. It's not like the Sheff Utd "goal", where it was plainly clear that the goal line technology failed.

Dan Burn was stood slightly behind the rest of his defence - he might well have kept Shaw onside. He's standing on the other side of the pitch though, so it's not easy to tell. But there's a reasonable chance that Shaw was onside.