I'm struggling to take the 4th (of 3 tiers) seriously. All I can hear is... please log in to view this image ...and my only reaction is... please log in to view this image
The problem with quoting Animal House in relation to serious event is..... ...actually there isn't one. There's always something more apt than from any other source... please log in to view this image ...and it's a hell of a lot more intelligent. So, should we worry about the new strain of the virus?..... please log in to view this image
So, no in-laws at Christmas... please log in to view this image That's another habit to give up in the New Year!
When is one of the people allowed to ask questions, going to ask him when he's going to resign and let someone sensible have a go?
He's got to **** up Brexit first, so that they can blame everything on the incompetence of the previous government.
The ones I've met 'Nutty' Norman Baker- Dim Lib- ex MP for Lewes. Used to run a petrol station opposite our squats. Banned all of us squatters from buying tobacco and skins. What kind of Socialist is that? Cvnt. David Bellotti - Dim Lib Eastbourne, Ran the YMCA in Lewes, gone like a bat out of hell once elected. A rat leaving a sinking ship. A fence squatter until he saw an opportunity. George Galloway - Tried to shake my hand and ponse a beer off me at the same time when I first met him. The kind of guy who thought his own **** didn't smell. Ponse David Lepper, Brighton Pavilion, before the green genie bird. Had more blind eyes than a ship full of Nelsons. The Brighton Labour party was a den of iniquity leading up to the 97 election, booze, drugs and prostitutes on some of the Russian visits, and even in Brighton, some of the Labour councillors in those days challenged Harvey Weinstein for ****baggedness. I owned a maisonette in Brighton and occasionally their parties were held in the basement flat downstairs. I often got invited. Lepper wouldn't rock the boat in case it rocked him. David Rutley, we were at school together, ain't seen him since, don't really want to. His dad John Rutley, a local tory councillor was a cvnt, I doubt if David is much different.
Then comes this announcement... please log in to view this image It'll be our fault....and we'll sure as hell end up paying for it.
Is it a legal definition of treason? No, of course not - but the simple question that needs to be asked is "What is treason?", considering the Daily Mail likes to label dozens of people traitors every single year (but never James Hewitt or Will carling or anyone else who boinked Princess Diana, who are all legally traitors under British law, but we don't see either of them being sent to the Tower for some reason...) And that's the point: the literal definition of treason isn't just trying to overthrow the monarchy, it's simply about betrayal of trust and/or a breach of faith, and that is absolutely the definition the Daily Mail use when throwing the word around about Gina Miller of High Court judges or anyone else who stood up and said this whole leaving the Eu thing off the back of an advisory referendum might not be a brilliant idea And with this definition in mind, if somebody were such a control freak they would certainly believe that it was a betrayal for somebody to have a different opinion would be seen as a betrayal of trust and/or a breach of faith, and if they were to do such a thing they would have to be dealt with either by a suspension from the party or being removed from the shadow cabinet...which are examples of things Starmer has done in the past six months To be blunt, Starmer's approach to leadership can be summed up by one Harold Wilson quote "Every dog is allowed one bite, but a different view is taken of a dog that goes on biting all the time. He may not get his licence returned when it falls due." And this is my issue with Starmer: people on "his" side are allowed to say whatever the hell they like without censure, be it Lisa Nandy turning into Jayda Fransen or Rosie Duffueld turning into JK Rowling, but if anyone on the "other" side so much as looks at him funny that's them suspended, and that's simply not showing leadership and instead it's showing solidarity to his mates and saying everyone else can **** off - and that's what the Tories have done since time immemorial so how in the name of Keir Hardie is that any form of opposition? On top of anything else, he's not even being a Buyrite Blair like he thinks he is: Blair didn't punch left, he used the left as window dressing to pretend that he wasn't dragging the party not just towards the centre but past it, but you know which Labour leader did make a habit of punching left to marginalise a large swathe of party support? Neil Kinnock, that bastion of electability...
That's all nonsense though, I'm afraid. Nobody's been accused of treason and Starmer's not biting anyone. Corbyn bit. He knew what was going to happen, as Labour attempt to shift these accusations of antisemitism, yet he did it anyway. Now his ludicrous loyalists are trying to keep the accusations going and rip the party apart, as they like having a Tory government, apparently. Starmer isn't hitting left, he's being hit by Corbynites who only want Dear Loser in charge. The same would be true of anyone who replaced him, unless it was somebody equally useless.
Starmer's not biting? He's literally going after a blog that called him a wet wipe for not having any recognisable policies this week The problem is that Starmer seems to like the Tories being in charge considering he's filled his shadow cabinet with people who shanked Corbyn in the back for four years, and is refusing to comment on the Labour Leaks in no small part due to Wes Streeting being disciplined for being so prominent in it by...being given a spot in the shadow cabinet Also, what's the excuse for Starmer kicking Nadia Whittome, Beth Winter and Olivia Blake out of the shadow cabinet for the crime of not abstaining on a vote? That doesn't fit the narrative and you know it doesn't - but it certainly fits with that Harold Wilson quote
More than anything else, how comes there aren't countless headlines right now saying that maybe the clueless ****er shouldn't have spent months saying Christmas would go ahead as planned? Not least because a.) He said it'd all be over by June b.) By complete coincidence, Trump said Easter would go ahead as normal Two good optics right there...
By "going after" you mean responding to, don't you? What a vicious fascist. The rest of this is just proving my point. Corbyn was betrayed and now his followers must betray in kind. That's very healthy and will certainly topple the Tories at the next election.
Because our press is largely owned by Tories, their donors and those that agree with their ****ty policies.
Nigel Farage blaming foreigners for the faults of the British government. I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
Simple question: did you ever see Corbyn ever get riled up by a blog post about him and respond to it? Or either of Tim Farron, Vince Cable or Jo Swinson? Yet here's Starmer, trying to stamp out dissention no matter how small it is and revealing to the world that he has as much of a grasp of the Streisand Effect as the Tory front bench do He could've very easily let it exist within its own corner of the internet, just like he could've left alone people criticising Phil Gaskin on Twitter, but he can't do that - and as a result now more people know that Gaskin is deciding to creatively edit candidate shortlists entirely because Starmer's suspending people who criticise him on Twitter https://labourlist.org/2020/07/lett...onto-labours-west-of-england-mayor-shortlist/ https://labourlist.org/2020/08/part...rocess-for-west-of-england-mayoral-candidate/ There comes a point where it gets difficult to dismiss all criticism of Starmer as Momentumite propaganda, and for me it's when I found it impossible to tell him apart from this bloke
He got taken to court for doing exactly that. Richard Millett. I won't link to any of the rags that reported it.
Except he hasn't: the incident he's been taken to court over stems from Richard Millett and somebody else barging into a meeting with the Palestinian Return Centre and being consistently disruptive once they were inside, and at the end of it during Corbyn made an ill-advised (to put it mildly...) quip about understanding irony instead of completely blanking them in his summary at best, or if he quote-unquote had to refer to them make a comment about listening to other viewpoints Corbyn didn't go looking for Millett, Millett went looking for him, so there's no direct comparison
I'm guessing we're supposed to clap for the people working in customer service currently getting swamped with calls asking if they can cancel their 15lb turkey orders?
It's literally Corbyn responding to a blogger, which is what you said wouldn't happen. It's exactly what did happen.
