Message from US attack on Syria: "Don't kill people with chemical weapons. If you want to kill innocent people then blow them to bits or shoot them in the head. Just carry on as you were, but don't use chemicals."
Did the US attack do any good because Syrian planes from the same "bombed" airport took off and bombed the civilians again. Get it right,Trump. FOR GOD'S SAKE, GET SOMETHING RIGHT,TRUMP!
So what you're saying is that, instead of asking for Israeli approval before bombing Syria, the US should have bombed Israel for their use of white phosphorous during their attacks on Gaza?
Looks like the Russian navy have arrived there. I believe Putin, North Korean twit and Trump are just plain dangerous...and I didn't even mention Isis!
That's from 2013. There's been no follow-up tweet about Trump, so far. Hannity has had a little cry about being misrepresented, though. It's wrong to directly quote the things that he's posted himself, apparently.
FYI, when you're saying that it is preferable for billions of people to be killed in a nuclear fireball than to have Hillary Clinton as POTUS, that's the moment where you've not so much left the reservation but were never in the same universe as the reservation to begin with.
And if that doesn't scare the **** out of you enough, just go visit his Twitter feed...... This ****er has SERIOUS issues - and if he was of a different 'faith' he would likely be on a Watch list!
Another one bites the dust!! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39546360 Becoming something of a revolving door and certainly casts further serious doubts on Trumps credibility.
Borussia Dortmund football team bus hit by explosion http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39571776 ****!!! Not sure where this best sits but guessing that the motivation will be 'political' with a small 'p'.
Meanwhile, the Stockholm attack has dropped from the news remarkably quickly I'd hate to infer, let alone imply, it's because the person responsible doesn't fit a certain profile...but I'm not quite sure how to finish this sentence.
Just imagine if Hillary was president.Business as usual.No bullcrapping......and the Republicans saying how wonderful the country would be if we won the election......tweeting? I very much doubt it.......and Putin throwing up in his bog, crying "I'm in trouble now" and...."send those email dopes to Siberia!".....oh no! Just shoot 'em!
...and yet the website to apply for Canadian entry visas still would've crashed. It's just Breitbart wouldn't have described the reason for this as a bunch of "snowflakes" looking for their "safe place" given it would be their readers doing it.
Really? If you asked me to profile the attacker, then the only part that I'd have got wrong would've been his country of origin. I'd have expected him to be another homegrown terrorist, rather than an Uzbekistan national. The same radicalised by the internet, out on the piss, the pull and the blow bullshit, though. People are far too accepting of crap that they read online, for some reason. It's a wonderful advertising tool, as you can basically sell anything. Some idiot will buy it.
Sean Spicer's spent the day digging himself an increasingly large hole, starting badly and getting worse. I don't know what possessed him to bring Hitler into things, but that rarely ends well. He's now being accused of Holocaust denial and there are various calls for his head. I suspect that part of him would like to get his marching orders, honestly. It's bound to happen eventually, so he may as well get out now, as things will only get worse.
As soon as it was revealed Uzbek national Rakhmat Akilov was responsible, as opposed to Syrian national Mohammed bin-Laden (or whatever fits the Narrative), you could literally see the story slipping down the running order over the course of a few hours. What this really does is prove that Trump's travel ban is unworkable: Akilov would have been free to travel to the US as Uzbekistan isn't on the watch list, just like the Boston bombers would have been free to travel as they were Chechen or those responsible for 9/11 would have been exempt as Saudi Arabia and the UAE are exempt. So what does this ban actually prevent?
I think that the story slipped a bit for multiple reasons. They caught the guy, he seems to be another internet radical and there's nothing exciting about him. As for Trump's ban, it doesn't prevent anything and I don't think it's intended to. It appeals to his base and makes it look like he's doing something and that the evil Liberals are trying to stop him. Job done, as far as he's concerned. Divides the country, undermines the judiciary and makes headlines.
Spicer has the IQ of a gatepost. He's so dumb that he probably doesn't associate Zyklon B with what Assad has done. Or maybe German Jews don't count as 'people' in his book. Only he knows the answer, but i suspect he won't be around much longer to elaborate
