I seen a film about the guy with the stutter. The King's Speech its called. Seemed like a decent chap Bertie.
He got up to a bit more than that, though as his own private secretary described him as 'a man who's mental development ceased in adolesence', doubtless he was manipulated a bit too. His own father really didn't want him to become King and predicted that he would 'destroy himself within 12 months' if he did. The Nazis kindly guarded his French properties for him (at his request) during the war, which he blamed "Roosevelt and the Jews' for. Plenty more of this kind of stuff out there, a really horrible piece of work, rightly despised by the rest of his family.Yes, Uncle Edward was a disgrace - he'd get up to bad stuff like teaching his niece the Nazi salute and abdicating as king. Spent the war in exile in Bermuda where he couldn't do much harm
Corbyn and 48 rebels did defy the "leadership" and vote against..It is shameful that our opposition party cannot mount a statement bigger than this.
It is a disgrace that the Labour party has lost its heart and soul and no longer understands the foundations on which is was built. Cornyn is its last chance...and I know it will not take it...and will take again the middle of the road option of Burnham.
Thank you for the easy question Col.Were the foundations of the Labour Party built upon thinking as left wing as Corbyn?
Sort of, but much more coherent. Corbyn's a lightweight, even compared to the 'lefties' of the Fifties. Ask him to set up the NHS, or rebuild housing stock after a war, and we'd find out. Labour needs a modern Nye Bevan, and it hasn't got one.Were the foundations of the Labour Party built upon thinking as left wing as Corbyn?
Thank you for the easy question Col.
Yes
Please read the Ragged Trousered Philanthropist....
Sort of, but much more coherent. Corbyn's a lightweight, even compared to the 'lefties' of the Fifties. Ask him to set up the NHS, or rebuild housing stock after a war, and we'd find out. Labour needs a modern Nye Bevan, and it hasn't got one.
Labour now almost irrelevant. If the Tories can hold themselves together over Europe they are looking at 10 years plus.
They created the welfare state and nationalised most of our core industry Col, all the things that Thatcher wanted to deconstruct, none of her predecessors dared to, and bizarrely the current charisma free bunch are finally completing the job. I can have no criticism of what Osborne is doing, it's pure, hardcore Toryism. He has a good chance of genuinely changing the shape of the State, some of which is well overdue. And I suspect he's trying to get the pain over with quickly to give him the chance to start giving stuff away before the next election. Bet they won't touch the most expensive and desperately in need of reform area though - the NHS, a great concept dying on its feet.I didn't realise that the Labour Party of the 40s and 50s was so left wing.
I'm not sure the British people today want that tbh. The most successful Labour Government in recent times was with Blair, who was basically a Tory!
I didn't realise that the Labour Party of the 40s and 50s was so left wing!
Dr WATSon, when I was banned I read with sadness how you said you revered wealth. It actually upset me, given that you're a young man and not a nasty old cu*t.
I think its a very destructive set of beliefs you have. Ambition is fantastic. What you claim to have is a whole other ball game.
You misread my post entirely Sir. Please reread
I do revere wealth.