You must log in or register to see media
It’s not like he owned some massive site with hundreds of employees turning over millions. He was a self-employed bod in a shed.
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media
It’s not like he owned some massive site with hundreds of employees turning over millions. He was a self-employed bod in a shed.
This is just the proof that politicians churn out their spiel without any conviction or understanding for the meaning of what they say to us. The constant ‘ums’ while he trying to think of a coherent vs political answer shows he doesn’t have a clue what he is telling us (and there are plenty more politicians like him for sure, the difference is he’s meant to be the ‘Leader’ of his party, manifesto and this country soon).You must log in or register to see media
Perhaps if he didn’t make such a big thing about it Starmer would have an easier ride. After all, by simply not mentioning that his dad beat up his mum (who understandably had serious mental illnesses) and his own convoluted family life Boris Johnson managed to escape any scrutiny about it.Do other countries have this weird obsession with leaders having a hard upbringing?
Starmer’s sounds pretty normal and an ordinary but admirable story of a kid bettering himself. His mum had Still’s disease since he was 11 which I’m sure was pretty tough for the family financially and otherwise but really who cares when it comes to deciding who would be a better PM?
It’s a bit odd that, given that we are continually told that the only thing the great British public is interested in is cutting immigration - both small boats and legal - that simultaneously they are preparing to hand a super majority to a party which doesn’t really have a policy on immigration and certainly isn’t talking about it.
Still, I’m sure Nige will make sure we don’t forget about it. These foreigners polluting our precious bodily fluids.
Oh right, so voters are flocking to a party with little interest in immigration because another party in government has failed to control it, and a third party has little else to talk about?Not odd. If Reform (created in response to mass immigration) had not been formed, the Tories would be breathing down Labour's neck, despite a woeful governmental record on a number of matters. Mass immigration is highly relevant in this election. It's existence is Labour's gain.
Oh right, so voters are flocking to a party with little interest in immigration because another party in government has failed to control it, and a third party has little else to talk about?
It’s not like he owned some massive site with hundreds of employees turning over millions. He was a self-employed bod in a shed.
It will be interesting to see what the voter turn out will be. I can see it being the lowest for a while, but we’ve had some low ones this century already (2001 - a labour landslide)
My 87-year-old father has already burnt his voting card saying all of ‘them’ are a complete waste of time and not worth a vote.
You must log in or register to see images
It's probably just disillusioned Tories staying at home. I have a feeling that Reform are going to do so well on 4th July that the Tories will lose out to the LibDems as the largest opposition party, which would be funny. I've got a bet on Reform to get 7 or more seats.It’s interesting how Blair’s “Things Can Only Get Better” 1997 landslide was delivered despite a significant fall in turnout compared to Major’s 1992 surprise majority, as well as the declining enthusiasm for the New Labour project that followed. If the opinion polls etc. are correct this time around then Starmergeddon will get his landslide from a very low turnout. Can it be that the electorate only usher Labour in reluctantly and unenthusiastically these days?
It's probably just disillusioned Tories staying at home. I have a feeling that Reform are going to do so well on 4th July that the Tories will lose out to the LibDems as the largest opposition party, which would be funny. I've got a bet on Reform to get 7 or more seats.
It’s interesting how Blair’s “Things Can Only Get Better” 1997 landslide was delivered despite a significant fall in turnout compared to Major’s 1992 surprise majority, as well as the declining enthusiasm for the New Labour project that followed. If the opinion polls etc. are correct this time around then Starmergeddon will get his landslide from a very low turnout. Can it be that the electorate only usher Labour in reluctantly and unenthusiastically these days?