Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
We just don't have the capability for a full on, troops in the field, conventional war. For years our forces have had their numbers, equipment and funding chipped away.

Being a member of NATO means that any incursion on any of it's members forces us to deploy, along with the other 29 nations. Insane as he is, surely Putin won't go after the Baltics or any other countries in that area.

Committing troops to Ukraine? Just can't see it happening.

I obviously didn't mean troops on the ground just from the UK mate.
Although, as you well know, there are certain areas where we still lead the world.
I meant does anyone think Nato should put troops on the ground?
I think that's just too risky and could lead to massive escalation in a World scale.
As you say, if Putin invades a Nato country then we'll have no choice other than to go in (Nato, not just us!!).
I'm now fearful that Putin has gone over the edge, meaning all bets are off.
 
I obviously didn't mean troops on the ground just from the UK mate.
Although, as you well know, there are certain areas where we still lead the world.
I meant does anyone think Nato should put troops on the ground?
I think that's just too risky and could lead to massive escalation in a World scale.
As you say, if Putin invades a Nato country then we'll have no choice other than to go in (Nato, not just us!!).
I'm now fearful that Putin has gone over the edge, meaning all bets are off.

Still waiting to hear your opinion of what the West should do Col ?

Might have to wait till later for me to see as I’m off to bed. Was a busy night of CPR which bizarrely worked.
I’ve eaten a cake to celebrate
 
Ok if you want my opinión…of course we shouldn’t commit forces. You’d be a ****ing idiot to think that’s a good idea. But of course there are a lot of ****ing idiots in this country who will be happy for that to happen

There’s probably one or two on here

Ok mate.
As I say, you saying we'll do "**** all" came across as a criticism. Apologies if I got that wrong.
Not sure anyone on here has suggested that we (Nato) should put troops into Ukraine.
I certainly don't think we should.

The UK has been at the forefront in helping Ukraine though. Without doubt, we would have had "special advisers" there for many weeks and we've supplied a lot of kit.

For me, we now need to carry out the hardest sanctions possible, although I'm wary of causing too much hardship to ordinary Russians, who aren't to blame for any of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staines R's
Ok mate.
As I say, you saying we'll do "**** all" came across as a criticism. Apologies if I got that wrong.
Not sure anyone on here has suggested that we (Nato) should put troops into Ukraine.
I certainly don't think we should.

The UK has been at the forefront in helping Ukraine though. Without doubt, we would have had "special advisers" there for many weeks and we've supplied a lot of kit.

For me, we now need to carry out the hardest sanctions possible, although I'm wary of causing too much hardship to ordinary Russians, who aren't to blame for any of this.

Good answer Col.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
Here's a worrying scenario. One of Ukraine's effective weapons are drones - cheap and effective bought from Turkey. Obviously, drones can be operated from afar, and will need to be increasingly, as the Russian Army occupies Ukraine. Unlike Afghanistan where the Russian's were beaten, Ukraine is flat and doesn't have obvious ambush points - so the drone is a blessing. But suppose Ukraine Resistance operates them from Poland or one of the other NATO countries? This is how the war could escalate.
 
Here's a worrying scenario. One of Ukraine's effective weapons are drones - cheap and effective bought from Turkey. Obviously, drones can be operated from afar, and will need to be increasingly, as the Russian Army occupies Ukraine. Unlike Afghanistan where the Russian's were beaten, Ukraine is flat and doesn't have obvious ambush points - so the drone is a blessing. But suppose Ukraine Resistance operates them from Poland or one of the other NATO countries? This is how the war could escalate.

There are many ways this can go tits up mate.

What happens if one of our 'special advisers' is captured?

Cyber war is the next stage and will get very bad imo.
 
Ok mate.
As I say, you saying we'll do "**** all" came across as a criticism. Apologies if I got that wrong.
Not sure anyone on here has suggested that we (Nato) should put troops into Ukraine.
I certainly don't think we should.

The UK has been at the forefront in helping Ukraine though. Without doubt, we would have had "special advisers" there for many weeks and we've supplied a lot of kit.

For me, we now need to carry out the hardest sanctions possible, although I'm wary of causing too much hardship to ordinary Russians, who aren't to blame for any of this.
I don’t think any of us want innocent/ordinary Russians to suffer but if a bigger tide of resistance to Putin is to happen - and potentially cause his demise in whatever fashion that might be - do you not think this is necessary fallout of the sanctions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steelmonkey
I don’t think any of us want innocent/ordinary Russians to suffer but if a bigger tide of resistance to Putin is to happen - and potentially cause his demise in whatever fashion that might be - do you not think this is necessary fallout of the sanctions.

Probably, yes.
 
There are many ways this can go tits up mate.

What happens if one of our 'special advisers' is captured?

Cyber war is the next stage and will get very bad imo.

Presumably it would be difficult for the Russian's to prove what the "special advisor" was doing. The Russians used the same tactic with men in green uniforms in Domblas. They were in fact Russian military in disguise.

I think the drone thing could well be an issue, because drones are small and devastatingly effective. I agree with you the next phase is cyber warfare, and in that respect, it all seems to be coming one way, from Russia to the West. I hope we are hitting back but it's just not reaching our media.

Of the Russian population, your average working Russian seems to be buying Putin's line that this is all a temporary incursion to protect fellow Russian's in Domblas etc. It's the Russian intelligentsia who have access to the internet that see things in perspective and are objecting
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
I don’t think any of us want innocent/ordinary Russians to suffer but if a bigger tide of resistance to Putin is to happen - and potentially cause his demise in whatever fashion that might be - do you not think this is necessary fallout of the sanctions.
This is the beginning of the end for Putin. Listening to a Ukrainian yesterday saying this is the 21st Century and not some cold war past. Peoples minds have changed. 50 demonstrations in Russia and 1800 arrests. In the US and UK Russian and Ukraine flags flying side by side. He has underestimated this, which will be his downfall. I could go on about the EU but that will be for another day. Germany and Italy holding up the SWIFT question was is quite sad.
However the Russian people may have to suffer before the kick this gangster out.
 
I pose this hypothetical question:
Russia enters Ukraine & takes control
China is looking at Taiwan looking to take control

Then how long will Boris wait to invade Scotland to get the Calcutta cup back
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr and bobmid
For me, we now need to carry out the hardest sanctions possible, although I'm wary of causing too much hardship to ordinary Russians, who aren't to blame for any of this.

Good post, but the quoted bit is the dilemma. For sanctions to work, they need to hurt the whole Russian economy, with the aim of crippling, or better yet even toppling, Putin from the inside. How we do that without causing hardship for ordinary Russians is beyond me.

There was a good article in The Times calling for al private schools in England/USA/beyond to expel every Russian student - you can't expect a comfortable Western education if your country is invading sovereign nations etc etc. The sort of thing that would get the richer classes agitated. Terribly unfair on the 12 year old kid that hasn't done anything wrong, but the sort of effective measure we should be looking at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
Good post, but the quoted bit is the dilemma. For sanctions to work, they need to hurt the whole Russian economy, with the aim of crippling, or better yet even toppling, Putin from the inside. How we do that without causing hardship for ordinary Russians is beyond me.

There was a good article in The Times calling for al private schools in England/USA/beyond to expel every Russian student - you can't expect a comfortable Western education if your country is invading sovereign nations etc etc. The sort of thing that would get the richer classes agitated. Terribly unfair on the 12 year old kid that hasn't done anything wrong, but the sort of effective measure we should be looking at.

Agreed.
It seems impossible not to harm ordinary Russians whilst achieving the aim of ousting Putin.
As you say, it needs to come from within.

A long, scary road ahead.