Nearly as bad as Starmer who said that Hancock should resign... and 24 hours later when he did said “why didn’t Boris sack him”?I see johnson is now claiming he fired Hancock. Does the PM even know what day of the week it is? What a clown
I wonder what he will say in another 24hrs? 
Who knows and whats it matter what Starmer says? Im talking about Hancocks now ex boss. You know the one, the U-turn king.Nearly as bad as Starmer who said that Hancock should resign... and 24 hours later when he did said “why didn’t Boris sack him”?I wonder what he will say in another 24hrs?
![]()
The thing is bob you have stated that Boris claims to have sacked him? Not sure where you have that info from because the news says what Bojo has said... and its not what you are claiming.Who knows and whats it matter what Starmer says? Im talking about Hancocks now ex boss. You know the one, the U-turn king.
Yeah i could be wrong mate, think it was a daily mail headline that popped up. Probably wrong granted. Ive been trying to disable them for months now but not the best with technology.The thing is bob you have stated that Boris claims to have sacked him? Not sure where you have that info from because the news says what Bojo has said... and its not what you are claiming.
Yeah i could be wrong mate, think it was a daily mail headline that popped up. Probably wrong granted. Ive been trying to disable them for months now but not the best with technology.
Don't listen to them because they are wrong. Boris has been very careful with his wording today. He has distanced himself from Hancock who should have fallen on his sword long ago ( pardon the pun) and ‘bigging up’ javid... which he should do as he will be 100 times better and wont be as ‘twatish”.Yeah i could be wrong mate, think it was a daily mail headline that popped up. Probably wrong granted. Ive been trying to disable them for months now but not the best with technology.
As i said, he didn't say he sacked him. Its a misleading headline that will end up on Twitter and many ‘nappy rashers’ will spread false information. You then get people like Stroller believing it and boring me with misinformation.Boris Johnson says he SACKED Matt Hancock | Daily Mail Online
Turns out now that Hancock was using a private email account to hand out Covid contracts to all his mates.
As i said, he didn't say he sacked him. Its a misleading headline that will end up on Twitter and many ‘nappy rashers’ will spread false information. You then get people like Stroller believing it and boring me with misinformation.
Don't listen to them because they are wrong. Boris has been very careful with his wording today. He has distanced himself from Hancock who should have fallen on his sword long ago ( pardon the pun) and ‘bigging up’ javid... which he should do as he will be 100 times better and wont be as ‘twatish”.
You need to ask Boris.It's in the Mail, it must be true.
Johnson backed him and then after he resigned tried to take credit for getting rid of him.
Johnson could have sacked Hancock any time he liked. Why didn't he?
You need to ask Boris.![]()
I'm asking his arse-licker.

ah bless a “nappy rasher” is getting nasty.
Maybe you should do one of your prediction things and ask posters the reason why?
Maybe we should blame it on Brexit?
Don't think anyone has a problem with legal immigrantsWe have the most corrupt, amoral, inept government in living memory, but all will be forgiven if they're a bit nastier to immigrants.
Sadly Stroller you always sound like a bitter old Labour voter who didn't get what he wanted. You need get over it fella. Labour are unelectable because they are cr2p and have a dull leader. I won't go into the policies because it's not comedy hour.No, we should blame it on Johnson.
But as you mention Brexit...
All the terrible things that have happened due to Brexit, that Brexiteers promised wouldn’t happen | indy100