Has nothing to do with Hancock. Stick to the debate Mao,Bad apples used to get thrown away. Now they get promoted in return for loyalty.
Has nothing to do with Hancock. Stick to the debate Mao,Bad apples used to get thrown away. Now they get promoted in return for loyalty.
Has nothing to do with Hancock. Stick to the debate Mao,
Cut out all your rubbish and show me facts. Show me where he broke ministerial code or shut up.Yeah his competence and incorruptibility have shone throughout the last year and a bit.
You must log in or register to see images
“Mistakes were made” etc etc.
Cut out all your rubbish and show me facts. Show me where he broke ministerial code or shut up.
Sorry Watford but you can’t show the evidence so go and bore someone else with your rubbish. It’s Saturday, sunny and QPR are playing. I don’t want to waste my day listening to your rubbish.If you don’t want to admit to yourself that their conduct throughout all of this stinks then that’s up to you but windmilling about a ministerial code that gets broken without consequence isn’t much of a defence.
Can’t let a good crisis go to waste.
The 'ministerial code' is a weak argument to be fair. What does it actually mean? **** all !! It's about what's right and wrong. I very much doubt Hancocks family firm would have got that contract if it hadn't been Hancocks family firm. But hey ho, we should all try and screw as much out of this government as possible by following example.If you don’t want to admit to yourself that their conduct throughout all of this stinks then that’s up to you but windmilling about a ministerial code that gets broken without consequence isn’t much of a defence.
Can’t let a good crisis go to waste.
Well actually Col the point of the argument is if Hancock broke ministerial code and he did not. Saying all MPs have got their snouts in the trough is a bit of a sweeping comment. Plenty of MPs over the years have been decent servants, not only their constituency but to the country. You will always get a few bad apples.
Cut out all your rubbish and show me facts. Show me where he broke ministerial code or shut up.
You only ever come out of the woodwork when it’s anything Tory. You were absent when your anti-Semitic mate Jezza was suspended for his behaviour.Johnson effectively scrapped the ministerial code by refusing to take action over Priti Vacant when she was found to have breached it. His ethics adviser resigned over the issue and hasn't been replaced. They do as they please.
You only ever come out of the woodwork when it’s anything Tory. You were absent when your anti-Semitic mate Jezza was suspended for his behaviour.
You don’t mention Len McCluskey and his dodgy £98m Unite hotel and the £4K that went to a Labour MP. Or the countless Labour MPs that have done wrong. Get back under your rock.

Don’t you think you should wait for the inquiry? Hancock’s shares in Topwood were in 2019, before Covid.The point is, this government are awarding contracts to mates and family. Whether it's above board or not, it's sleazy.
The point is, this government are awarding contracts to mates and family. Whether it's above board or not, it's sleazy.
Is that the best you can do? You are always wrong. Jezza/Trump/Brexit “it ain’t over yet”! Get back under your rock.
You only ever come out of the woodwork when it’s anything Tory. You were absent when your anti-Semitic mate Jezza was suspended for his behaviour.
You don’t mention Len McCluskey and his dodgy £98m Unite hotel and the £4K that went to a Labour MP. Or the countless Labour MPs that have done wrong. Get back under your rock.
Oh Crap Chairman Mao is back with his anti British rubbish. Ain’t you moved away yet?Whataboutery.
Is that the best you can do? You are always wrong. Jezza/Trump/Brexit “it ain’t over yet”! Get back under your rock.

As I said Stroller come back when you can get something right...
muppet.“Jezza is the man to lead the country”actually
![]()
Eer corruption? You are accusing people without any facts. Go away you silly sod.Not sure what this has to do with your patriotic attempts to defend corruption.