Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
All you need to know about Ms Swinson.

You must log in or register to see media

Actually, I welcome the Lib Dem policy on Brexit as it give ardent Remainers a clear and unambiguous box for their vote. However, you then will get the rest of their policies such as the compulsory wearing of corduroy, patches on elbows, and double geography on Wednesdays.
 
All you need to know about Ms Swinson.

You must log in or register to see media

Actually, I welcome the Lib Dem policy on Brexit as it give ardent Remainers a clear and unambiguous box for their vote. However, you then will get the rest of their policies such as the compulsory wearing of corduroy, patches on elbows, and double geography on Wednesdays.
Yes, always partial to a good revoke clear out, and extra map reading on Wednesdays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber_Hoop
All you need to know about Ms Swinson.

You must log in or register to see media

Actually, I welcome the Lib Dem policy on Brexit as it give ardent Remainers a clear and unambiguous box for their vote. However, you then will get the rest of their policies such as the compulsory wearing of corduroy, patches on elbows, and double geography on Wednesdays.

Anyone who has experienced LibDem councils will know they can be just as 'austere' as the Tories. When you look at the ragbag MPs that have joined their ranks recently that should be enough to put off any waverers. Only the Eurofanatics will be heading their way nicely damaging Jezza's hopes...
 
Does anyone on here think that the attack on the Saudi oil facility is somewhat convenient ? Dare I say it but could it give the US a justifiable (in their eyes) reason to attack Iran ?

False flag op ?

No, I don’t see why Trump would be spoiling for a fight for two reasons:

1, He’s back on the campaign trail for four more years and he’ll get more ‘likes’ for his domestic policies rather than overseas; and

2, The US has become self-sufficient when it comes to hydrocarbons and has become (or soon will become) the world’s largest producer thanks to fracking. Not only does Trump need a low oil price to keep his electorate happy - which setting fire to Aramco oil facilities doesn’t achieve, quite the opposite - but the US doesn’t need to do favours for the Saudis, such as carry out retaliatory strikes on Iran, as a consequence of their own self-sufficiency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Does anyone on here think that the attack on the Saudi oil facility is somewhat convenient ? Dare I say it but could it give the US a justifiable (in their eyes) reason to attack Iran ?

False flag op ?

Absolutely I hope the US gets their arse kicked if it sparks off. And you can bet plenty of sheep here will jump on the bandwagon

Lock and load stupid ****s
The Russians would kick their arse

Hasn’t anyone learnt yet?
The USA is very corrupt imo and the sickening thing is every time they play the god card as well.
 
Absolutely I hope the US gets their arse kicked if it sparks off. And you can bet plenty of sheep here will jump on the bandwagon

Lock and load stupid ****s
The Russians would kick their arse

Hasn’t anyone learnt yet?
The USA is very corrupt imo and the sickening thing is every time they play the god card as well.

Blimey, have we just identified a country that you dislike more than the U.K.?