Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
You old lefties on here (Watford/Oslo/Stan/Stroller) have some front. Complaining about the Tories making the election all about personalities. Does no one remember a certain Tony Blair? Now he was a **** Watford!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldhawkRoad
You old lefties on here (Watford/Oslo/Stan/Stroller) have some front. Complaining about the Tories making the election all about personalities. Does no one remember a certain Tony Blair? Now he was a **** Watford!!

Blair was more Tory than most Tories. There's probably no hope for any genuinely left wing candidate now or in future.
 
Problem with Labour's manifesto is cost. It's all very laudable but the reality is that taxes they would be relying on wouldn't be delivered because those top earners would all either emigrate or find tax efficencies to avoid much of it. They'd have to increase taxes or bankrupt the country. I've heard many people say they'd happily pay 1p in the pound extra income tax to adequately fund the NHS (although I think it would need more), but so many of their plans require huge investment. The sums just don't add up, especially if Diane Abbott had anything to do with it. The whole thing is really pie-in-the-sky...
 
The Labour Party is not one party but two. The only thing that's keeping them together is the Blairites don't want to lose the name. Expect a hell of a scrap after June 8.
 
Problem with Labour's manifesto is cost. It's all very laudable but the reality is that taxes they would be relying on wouldn't be delivered because those top earners would all either emigrate or find tax efficencies to avoid much of it. They'd have to increase taxes or bankrupt the country. I've heard many people say they'd happily pay 1p in the pound extra income tax to adequately fund the NHS (although I think it would need more), but so many of their plans require huge investment. The sums just don't add up, especially if Diane Abbott had anything to do with it. The whole thing is really pie-in-the-sky...
Cancelling Article 50 would cover some of it.
 
Problem with Labour's manifesto is cost. It's all very laudable but the reality is that taxes they would be relying on wouldn't be delivered because those top earners would all either emigrate or find tax efficencies to avoid much of it. They'd have to increase taxes or bankrupt the country. I've heard many people say they'd happily pay 1p in the pound extra income tax to adequately fund the NHS (although I think it would need more), but so many of their plans require huge investment. The sums just don't add up, especially if Diane Abbott had anything to do with it. The whole thing is really pie-in-the-sky...

I know it's not official Labour policy, but scrapping Trident would fund quite a lot of nice things.
 
Top line the Labour manifesto looks interesting, though rather old fashioned (but what else to expect from a bunch of people who are rather locked into the 70s?). It's expensive though, very dependent on a strong economy, and the very fact of them being elected would have an instant hit on that (unfair but always the way), the corporation tax stuff (though I support it) would also impact, we know that the 'top 5%' are very good at creatively avoiding tax. Plus, of course, there is Brexit to be paid for and the economic impact of that too. I suspect that, however laudable the intentions, they would be firefighting on the economy from day one, and little of this apart from the tax rises would be delivered.

Of course the Tories will major on personality, even if May hasn't got one, and it's not just the media fuelling this, it's Corbyn's vague and contradictory statements.

Apparently May and Hammond not getting on, I'm guessing because Hammond actually wants to put some policies in their manifesto, which May will be very nervous about.

The 'leaked' manifesto (anyone else think it might be a rather clever ploy by Corbyn to get his ideas out before the Blairites sabotage them?) is pretty much what an old leftie like me has been wanting to hear from Labour for a very long time. 1970s? Well, they're talking about rolling back some of the worst excesses of Thatcherism (privatisation of natural monopolies, for example) so yes, if you like.

Labour has been Tory-lite for too long. This is what Labour should be - a real alternative. **** the Blairites.
 
The 'leaked' manifesto (anyone else think it might be a rather clever ploy by Corbyn to get his ideas out before the Blairites sabotage them?) is pretty much what an old leftie like me has been wanting to hear from Labour for a very long time. 1970s? Well, they're talking about rolling back some of the worst excesses of Thatcherism (privatisation of natural monopolies, for example) so yes, if you like.

Labour has been Tory-lite for too long. This is what Labour should be - a real alternative. **** the Blairites.

Problem you have though is a real Labour hasn't been elected for over a generation. It would take a pretty catastrophic economic collapse to give such a Labour a chance and even then I can't see the media backing it rather than blaming immigrants or Europe for our woes.
 
Problem you have though is a real Labour hasn't been elected for over a generation. It would take a pretty catastrophic economic collapse to give such a Labour a chance and even then I can't see the media backing it rather than blaming immigrants or Europe for our woes.

I'm encouraged by young people. It may take a while, but I have faith.
 
Mrs May was interviewed on LBC and questioned repeatedly about tax rises. She was asked at least three times if she would promise that the Conservatives would not raise tax and refused to do so each time - (no problem with that) saying...

“We are a party that believes in actually trying to ensure we have low taxes ... we have no plans to increase the level of tax but what I’m saying is that’s because we are party that believes in a low tax ... as a government, we would go into government with no plans to raise the level of tax.”

Which, as is often the case with what she says, is meaningless.

Every party believes in low taxes as a goal. Some parties in this election are acknowledging that low taxes may not be possible for a while without a total collapse in some of the things that make the UK great. I suspect the Conservatives fully understand there will be a need for tax rises to pay for things they plan to implement, in part to cover off the negative fiscal aspects of Brexit (not arguing it, just refusing to join Project Ostrich).

In the meantime they will hammer their competition for being honest before the election. Their supporters will lap it up and their opponents will be forced to spend time discussing the dead cat on the table. The Conservatives will then raise taxes afterwards whilst shrugging their shoulders.
 
I think the Labour manifesto is much needed to get politics back onto policies rather than endless leader character assassinations and petty squabbling. It's a distinctive set of proposals that give a proper alternative to the general trend of all parties to the right and an alternative to austerity.

The Lib Dems have also got an up to date vision statement on their website which, in lieu of their manifesto, gives a clear outline of where they stand.

The Tories will hopefully be prompted into some decisive action now to commit pledges and policies rather that passively meandering towards what they expect to be a large majority. They cannot just head through this repeating a mantra that would be as suited to an Andrex ad.

Of course, they might just spend the next few weeks solely attacking the other parties while making few assertions about where they want the country to go.

I hope they do make this a campaign based on who has the most solid policies because it's been years since there's been any discernable variety between the main parties.

Well done labour, you've given this election am adrenaline shot (and given me something to think about in the process).
 
I think the Labour manifesto is much needed to get politics back onto policies rather than endless leader character assassinations and petty squabbling. It's a distinctive set of proposals that give a proper alternative to the general trend of all parties to the right and an alternative to austerity.

The Lib Dems have also got an up to date vision statement on their website which, in lieu of their manifesto, gives a clear outline of where they stand.

The Tories will hopefully be prompted into some decisive action now to commit pledges and policies rather that passively meandering towards what they expect to be a large majority. They cannot just head through this repeating a mantra that would be as suited to an Andrex ad.

Of course, they might just spend the next few weeks solely attacking the other parties while making few assertions about where they want the country to go.

I hope they do make this a campaign based on who has the most solid policies because it's been years since there's been any discernable variety between the main parties.

Well done labour, you've given this election am adrenaline shot (and given me something to think about in the process).

All those referendum Leave voters who wanted to 'take back control' must surely support Labour's policies. Let's take back control of the railways, utilities and post office.
 
Mrs May was interviewed on LBC and questioned repeatedly about tax rises. She was asked at least three times if she would promise that the Conservatives would not raise tax and refused to do so each time - (no problem with that) saying...

“We are a party that believes in actually trying to ensure we have low taxes ... we have no plans to increase the level of tax but what I’m saying is that’s because we are party that believes in a low tax ... as a government, we would go into government with no plans to raise the level of tax.”

Which, as is often the case with what she says, is meaningless.

Every party believes in low taxes as a goal. Some parties in this election are acknowledging that low taxes may not be possible for a while without a total collapse in some of the things that make the UK great. I suspect the Conservatives fully understand there will be a need for tax rises to pay for things they plan to implement, in part to cover off the negative fiscal aspects of Brexit (not arguing it, just refusing to join Project Ostrich).

In the meantime they will hammer their competition for being honest before the election. Their supporters will lap it up and their opponents will be forced to spend time discussing the dead cat on the table. The Conservatives will then raise taxes afterwards whilst shrugging their shoulders.
Situations change, why commit yourself?