Now Farage has had stuff thrown at him again. I wish people wouldn’t do this, it’s a pathetic way to behave.
Radicalised Left
Now Farage has had stuff thrown at him again. I wish people wouldn’t do this, it’s a pathetic way to behave.
Same over here mate too except it's been 14 years. Have you got nice beaches over there?
It’s not confined to them though, is it?Radicalised Left
It’s not confined to them though, is it?
But more fatal, as Jo Cox’s family would attest.It looks like it was in this case, and the yogurt throwing woman. The disturbing number of serious attacks against politicians in Germany are largely Radicalised Left against right wing politicians, AfD. There have been attacks by the right too, but, so far as I can see, not so numerous
But more fatal, as Jo Cox’s family would attest.
Whoever commits this type of action, whether chucking a milkshake of seriously attacking a politician, for whatever motive, is moronic, contributing to the ongoing dumbing down of out political culture which the politicians are doing a great job of doing themselves with no external help.
Wow, just seen a Tory party election broadcast.100% attack ad on Labour’s alleged £2000 per household tax increase. Not a single word about their own policies. Lots of begging to go online and read a document about the tax stuff. Strikes me that if they want to go this route they should take a few lessons from the US versions of attack ads, which are genuinely shocking.
Anyone else noticed that all Labour’s tax promises are for no rises for ‘working people’. They’ve already stupidly promised not to raise corporation tax so that leaves capital gains and possibly pension contributions. Rejoice Strolls!
Meanwhile Starmer was somewhere talking about more nursery places, obviously a good thing if they are of good quality, but he described it as “helping parents get back into the ‘labour market’”, when any normal human being addressing the relevant bit of the population would say ‘get back to work’. He’s a grey, featureless robot. No one will vote for him with hope in their hearts.
My 84 year old mum who has an odious local MP called Sir Geoffrey Clifton Brown, who has done nothing since being first elected in 1992 (ever heard of him - possibly because he has been identified as the ‘worst MP’ in terms of attending Parliament and helping constituents. **** knows why they keep voting him in) is not impressed with the realistic alternative - a Lib Dem councillor who lives at the other end of the constituency and who has championed building 400 new homes in Moreton in the Marsh, which is already in permanent gridlock and has no facilities. So she is looking forward to spoiling her ballot paper for the first time. This is a miss for all the parties as she is the definition of a flo.
It’s not confined to them though, is it?
My wife and I were talking about that yesterday - clearly, those words have been chosen very carefully.
I wonder what potential taxable ‘items’ will come into play?
Higher rates of CGT? Introducing CGT on Principal Private Residences? Pension Pots? Higher rates/progressive rates on Inheritance Tax? Mansion Taxes? Wealth Taxes?
Whatever/whichever is chosen, let’s hope that there will be no ‘unintended consequences’ as was the case when Gordon Brown used his first budget to raid pension tax relief (ACT) in 1997.
The removal of dividend tax credits from pension schemes was a huge factor which contributed to the demise of the UK’s (gold-plated) Defined Benefit pension schemes.
That said, perhaps the phrase ‘unintended consequences’ is inappropriate given that Brown had been warned by officials that he risked long term damage to Britain's occupational pensions industry when he pressed ahead with the £5bn a year cut in tax relief in his very first budget.
Official Treasury documents indicate that officials told the chancellor that his decision to cut the long-standing tax break to pension funds would place an added burden on employers and could hasten the demise of final salary scheme pensions.
Prophetic words indeed.
Start hoarding bricks so you can fill in a few windowsMy wife and I were talking about that yesterday - clearly, those words have been chosen very carefully.
I wonder what potential taxable ‘items’ will come into play?
Higher rates of CGT? Introducing CGT on Principal Private Residences? Pension Pots? Higher rates/progressive rates on Inheritance Tax? Mansion Taxes? Wealth Taxes?
Whatever/whichever is chosen, let’s hope that there will be no ‘unintended consequences’ as was the case when Gordon Brown used his first budget to raid pension tax relief (ACT) in 1997.
The removal of dividend tax credits from pension schemes was a huge factor which contributed to the demise of the UK’s (gold-plated) Defined Benefit pension schemes.
That said, perhaps the phrase ‘unintended consequences’ is inappropriate given that Brown had been warned by officials that he risked long term damage to Britain's occupational pensions industry when he pressed ahead with the £5bn a year cut in tax relief in his very first budget.
Official Treasury documents indicate that officials told the chancellor that his decision to cut the long-standing tax break to pension funds would place an added burden on employers and could hasten the demise of final salary scheme pensions.
Prophetic words indeed.
Burnside
Wow, just seen a Tory party election broadcast.100% attack ad on Labour’s alleged £2000 per household tax increase. Not a single word about their own policies. Lots of begging to go online and read a document about the tax stuff. Strikes me that if they want to go this route they should take a few lessons from the US versions of attack ads, which are genuinely shocking.
Didn't take for his knighthood to remind us his Dad was a toolmaker. Every ****ing interview
Didn't take for his knighthood to remind us his Dad was a toolmaker. Every ****ing interview