Yes, anyone with money or sporting talent will be made very welcome.
In my borough of Spelthorne a massive amount of clothing, toiletries, women’s sanitary products and toys were donated to help welcome the 50 odd Afghan refugees, mostly women and children, that have recently arrived and are being looked after in a local Staines hotel…….
I would suggest this type of welcome has been across the board in most boroughs.
Of course you will never eliminate the ****s in this co7ntry, however the assumption that the majority in our country hold these vies, is in fact bollox
You must log in or register to see images
That’s one of the most pointless posts you’ve made Strolls and doesn’t come back on my point in anyway whatsoever.
Or course many in this country welcome immigrants Stainesy, but the majority don't. It probably breaks down about 52:48.
Leaving aside cheap political points, Emma Raducanu is simply a brilliant sportswoman with a steely determination to win. She'll have plenty of support worldwide, when she plays in the final. Hope she does it.
She is indeed a brilliant sportswoman and I'm as excited about her progress as anybody. I just find this kind of hypocrisy a little hard to take....
You must log in or register to see images
She's not zola BuddShe is indeed a brilliant sportswoman and I'm as excited about her progress as anybody. I just find this kind of hypocrisy a little hard to take....
You must log in or register to see images
She is indeed a brilliant sportswoman and I'm as excited about her progress as anybody. I just find this kind of hypocrisy a little hard to take....
You must log in or register to see images
Or course many in this country welcome immigrants Stainesy, but the majority don't. It probably breaks down about 52:48.
I know you are a little annoyed at brexit but you are normally a sensible poster strolls and even you can't believe that brexit was voted on PURELY immigration reasons.
Also to be entirely accurate thats 52:48 of people who voted so you've lumped in 20 million no voters into that as well![]()
No, of course it wasn't PURELY about immigration.
I've never been a flag waver where tennis is concerned, as I see it as a sport of individuals, but generally I see no hypocrisy whatsoever. The media reports I've read call her an example of the United Nations.
Her parents, Romanian and Chinese, work in finance and came to England from Canada when she was two. She grew up in Kent and sounds very English, but she alone can decide her nationality.
There's no doubt that the British system, particularly post Brexit, does favour achievement and skill in immigrants. Name me one developed country that doesn't do similarly.
We're about the same age, Strolls. When we were born, the worldwide population was 2.7 billion.
In a bit more than sixty years, it has increased to 7.8 billion, which incidentally has played havoc with the natural world and led to the extinction or near extinction of many animals. This is what concerns David Attenborough.
In a globe where large parts will be increasingly uninhabitable due to climate change and overheating, do you feel this incredible human population rise is sustainable?
Germany?
A strange response to a post about immigration. Are you suggesting that people in areas that become uninhabitable should be forced to stay put?
1. Germany's historic record on human rights is nothing to boast about. More recently, Merkel made a considered decision to let in Syrians, many of whom are well educated and skilled. I doubt she would have done the same for Afghanistan.
2. Of course that's now what I'm suggesting and well done for dodging the question (liberals generally do). The increase in worldwide population level is highly relevant to immigration, particularly into the Western world. Until it is controlled (probably by a worldwide family planning initiative - which incidentally is undermined by the Catholic church), quality of life in many regions and on many aspects will suffer.