Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
Yes, historical. Have you ever heard a president of the US ever come out with that?
The Republican Senator on CNN just said,

"No Republican will stand behind that statement. A bunch of that statement is not factual. It was incendiary. Not something the President of the U.S. should be saying. Disappointing and shocking".

The guy who said it is a former republican Presidential candidate.

That's how historical it was.
 
The Republican Senator on CNN just said,

"No Republican will stand behind that statement. A bunch of that statement is not factual. It was incendiary. Not something the President of the U.S. should be saying". Disappointing and shocking".

The guy who said it is a former republican Presidential candidate.

That's how historical it was.
I'm watching CNN and listening to what is being said. However, Trump's comments will go down in history. Good or bad, it's historical.
 
I'm watching CNN and listening to what is being said. However, Trump's comments will go down in history. Good or bad, it's historical.
As CNN are saying, Trump is racially abusing the blacks from Pittsburgh and Detroit who have contributed to his defeat. He is the lowest of the low.
 
That speech of Trump's tonight must be the worst I've heard. He could have Incited violent riots. He needs to get over it, congratulate his opponent, and hand over to him as soon as the votes are in.
 


You must log in or register to see images


Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO


This is insane.
He is literally plugging in the names of dead people and they are all returning as having voted in Michigan.
Where is our Department if Justice on this?
Why is it taking regular Americans to expose this level of obvious corruption?
Quote Tweet

You must log in or register to see images



Essential Fleccas

You must log in or register to see images

@fleccas
· 17h
ANOTHER ONE: Apparently June Aiken (born in 1900) voted via absentee ballot in Jackson County, Michigan. That would make them 120 years old!

Born in 1900!! twitter.com/fleccas/status…

You must log in or register to see media









3
 

You must log in or register to see images


Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO


This is insane.
He is literally plugging in the names of dead people and they are all returning as having voted in Michigan.
Where is our Department if Justice on this?
Why is it taking regular Americans to expose this level of obvious corruption?
Quote Tweet

You must log in or register to see images



Essential Fleccas

You must log in or register to see images

@fleccas
· 17h
ANOTHER ONE: Apparently June Aiken (born in 1900) voted via absentee ballot in Jackson County, Michigan. That would make them 120 years old!

Born in 1900!! twitter.com/fleccas/status…

You must log in or register to see media









3

You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
The extent of what fraud? Where's the evidence of any fraud?

There will be fraud, particularly in the postal/absentee voting. The question is, was it material to the result of the election?

As Finglas says, there will also be fraud on the Republican side.

Trump will have his lawyers pour over this. President Biden will have his lawyers investigate Republican fraud. None of this may change the result of the election, but it might just shine a light on poor electoral practices, which would be a plus, so it's not all bad imo
 
There will be fraud, particularly in the postal/absentee voting. The question is, was it material to the result of the election?

As Finglas says, there will also be fraud on the Republican side.

Trump will have his lawyers pour over this. President Biden will have his lawyers investigate Republican fraud. None of this may change the result of the election, but it might just shine a light on poor electoral practices, which would be a plus, so it's not all bad imo

Ok can't disagree with that. Good post
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goldhawk-Road
There will be fraud, particularly in the postal/absentee voting. The question is, was it material to the result of the election?

As Finglas says, there will also be fraud on the Republican side.

Trump will have his lawyers pour over this. President Biden will have his lawyers investigate Republican fraud. None of this may change the result of the election, but it might just shine a light on poor electoral practices, which would be a plus, so it's not all bad imo

Of course there will be isolated instances of fraud - on both sides - as there will be in any election. Trump's unfounded accusations of systematic fraud will only encourage his numbskull supporters to take to the streets. The man is a disgrace.
 
Trump's lead in Georgia is currently down to just 463 votes and Biden is also closing in in Pennsylvania. Biden will have 270 electoral college votes without either of these states and this will likely turn out to be a comfortable electoral college win for him. He will also have won the popular vote by about 4 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daverangers
Of course there will be isolated instances of fraud - on both sides - as there will be in any election. Trump's unfounded accusations of systematic fraud will only encourage his numbskull supporters to take to the streets. The man is a disgrace.

Yes, he should not engage in hyperbole because he does have some hot head supporters that have stocked up on guns.

But the fact is, all the MSM was predicting a Biden landslide. This has not materialised. Georgia is currently being predicted as being Biden by 500 votes. The Democrats have brought in new absentee voting. Trump can justifiably have his lawyers scrutinise this.

But in the meantime, he should not make unfounded claims of mass fraud
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELLERS