Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
I thought he did the decent thing in resigning as he's lost the vote. But there was something I enjoyed in his metaphorical "you deal with this **** now you fat clown" (drops mic) to Boris.

Personal relations did surely come into it. Dave could not face going into EU negotiations with his old school rival giving him orders behind the scenes
 
I think the EU have powers to force the issue. They can make their own laws if we leave them in limbo. If 27 agree, we could surely give us an ultimatum at the extreme
It sounds logical because they need financial clarity. As soon as the article is invoked then there are 2 years left of agricultural subventions, research grants and payments to assisted areas of the UK. so they are going to need clarity in order to plan ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldhawkRoad
Totally Yorkshire. I said before the result on here that if we stayed in i would accept it and i would have.
My Facebook is a nightmare so i am not going on it for a bit as people thinking its the end of the world!

On another note i could not sleep last night and was up at 2;30am so i watched a bit of the sky news stations CNN Fox RT CCTV (you know the sky ones). I was shocked listening to all the US analysts who thought we were better off out. They said the EU was not good for us. They also said they would always trade with us and nothing would change "why would it" as one said. They have no agenda like the Leave/Remain teams and it was refreshing to hear their views.

I am not stupid about all this and i know things will change. As one of the US blokes said "England cannot just set up manufacturing plants over night, it will take years". Over the years we have devalued much of our manufacturing (Thanks Tony Blair. I was young once but older people voted him in) . I also blame the Tories for this as well.

As a country we need to stick together and move forward because things cannot go back to what it was.

You're very gracious but the credit for the initial question is not mine. It was Stan who asked it. I merely answered it by referring to the one and only Nigel Farage who had conceded, 'unconceded' much to the amusement of the BBC coverage (I didn't know there was such a word and can't be bothered to check. I'm lazy and find it convenient to simply assume that he made it up, a skill in which he is a master when it comes to facts). The most notable bit being that when he thought he'd lost he could not waste anytime at all in seeking to shift the blame for that defeat on the temerity of the Government to extend the time for registration so that 2 million voters could actually participate and exercise their democratic right.
 
I think he left us in limbo - he had to resign but he could have waited until Monday and spent the weekend working out how to get things moving quickly. But he followed the Milliband/Clegg trend of jacking it it immediately.

Surely he's doing that anyway Stan. If he hadn't resigned they'd had been additional speculation of when he was going, plus the next leadership plotting anyway.
 
Surely he's doing that anyway Stan. If he hadn't resigned they'd had been additional speculation of when he was going, plus the next leadership plotting anyway.
It's just doing my head in that we have to wait until October for the next step to be taken because of internal Tory party issues. I suspect Goldie may be right and the EU will lose patience and change the rules to get things moving quicker. I'm rambling, ignore me.
 
We don't want to be rushed, but we don't want to make 27 enemies either, with hardened attitudes.

Let's exit on the French working time as it would take 150 years including 150 years worth of strikes and 2 hour lunch breaks.

I will tell you how long it took me to get a french bank account one day. Seriously it takes forever
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldhawkRoad
It's just doing my head in that we have to wait until October for the next step to be taken because of internal Tory party issues. I suspect Goldie may be right and the EU will lose patience and change the rules to get things moving quicker. I'm rambling, ignore me.

Well, internal Tory party issues were the only reason for the referendum in the first place so there's a certain symmetry...

The EU won't want to hang around as the uncertainty hurts their economies too, which might help us, but we don't want th to say sign this deal or **** off either.
 
The problem is if the Tories fartarse about until October to elect a new leader who then wishes to call an election, they may end up giving UKIP a golden chance to cash in on the Tories seemingly deliberately dragging their heels and Labour being in such a mess. The 52% may feel they have been misled and head towards voting for UKIP in a General Election which would really be a nightmare scenario...
 
I think the EU have powers to force the issue. They can make their own laws if we leave them in limbo. If 27 agree, we could surely give us an ultimatum at the extreme
I don't think that is correct. They will wait but agree we are trying to stall things as it helps us.
 
You're very gracious but the credit for the initial question is not mine. It was Stan who asked it. I merely answered it by referring to the one and only Nigel Farage who had conceded, 'unconceded' much to the amusement of the BBC coverage (I didn't know there was such a word and can't be bothered to check. I'm lazy and find it convenient to simply assume that he made it up, a skill in which he is a master when it comes to facts). The most notable bit being that when he thought he'd lost he could not waste anytime at all in seeking to shift the blame for that defeat on the temerity of the Government to extend the time for registration so that 2 million voters could actually participate and exercise their democratic right.

Sorry Yorkshire my eyesight is bad (seriously) and i sometimes cant really see what i type. I need glasses.
 
I'm hearing that there are a lot of people who voted Out as some kind of protest, not expecting the result to turn out as it did, that are now regretting it. Idiots.

I work with the general public and you'd be surprised how scary it is that so
They should have voted based on peoples belly buttons, innys v outys! (sp)

I have an umbilical hernia, I used to have an inny now it's half outy how would I have voted?
 
I don't think that is correct. They will wait but agree we are trying to stall things as it helps us.

The problem is, Article 50 has never been exercised before, so no one can be quite sure. Ultimately, speed of Article 50 notice may be a bargaining counter for the UK. I do believe the Brexiteers want informal talks with the EU now to try and get agreement on certain fundamentals eg getting access to the single market for something less than unqualified free movement of people. Once we give notice of Art 50, the reducing 2 year time period could be used by the EU to bring pressure on us unless we have this informal agreement
 
The problem is, Article 50 has never been exercised before, so no one can be quite sure. Ultimately, speed of Article 50 notice may be a bargaining counter for the UK. I do believe the Brexiteers want informal talks with the EU now to try and get agreement on certain fundamentals eg getting access to the single market for something less than unqualified free movement of people. Once we give notice of Art 50, the reducing 2 year time period could be used by the EU to bring pressure on us unless we have this informal agreement
Merkel seems our biggest friend at the moment, despite what her foreign minister said about getting on with it, she said there is no need for it to be nasty and the U.K. needs time to get itself organised.

Though I've just read that some senior law professor (yeah an expert) reckons that if Cameron opens his mouth to confirm that the referendum means the UK will be leaving when he meets the other EU leaders next in the Council of MinistersTuesday that could be considered as formal notification. Apparently he's not allowed to join their discussions on the next day, when they will talk about him behind his back.
 
Last edited:
David Lammy has become the first MP (as far as I am aware) to suggest that parliament should reject the referendum result.

What a mess.
 
All the lamb where I shop is either British or New Zealand. Don't we trade with these countries already? Lot of hideous Ugg boots about. And Anchor butter. And South African wine. And Canadian Maple Syrup. And Indian steel.
Think how much more you could have if it was all tariff free
 
Never been more proud to be British. Nothing to do with the result but the fact that a truly democratic process was able to occur. People from all parties could vote how they saw fit - not sure this could or would happen anywhere else in the world.

Yes of course there will be fallout from the result - but I sense it's just another Millennium Bug type panic - remember when the world was supposed to fall apart 16 years ago. It didn't then and it won't now....... at least not as a result of our referendum.
 
David Lammy has become the first MP (as far as I am aware) to suggest that parliament should reject the referendum result.

What a mess.

Yes, let's all let Lammy lead us into anarchy. He might get away with that in some unreconstructed ex Soviet block country or a Central African state but not in a Parliamentary democracy where trust between governors and governed is sacred, even if not perfect
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber_Hoop