some people
and not just me
have far too much time on their hands
Natural History Museum is branded sexist...
for not having enough female animal exhibits
Victoria Allen Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail
18 hrs ago
Although progress is being made against sexism, there are still pockets of resistance... such as among long-dead exhibits at the Natural History Museum.
A study of five museums found that women weren't the only females forced to fight sexism – apparently leopards and lions face it, too, with the famous London collection and others accused of being prejudiced.
File video: Duchess of Cambridge visits the Natural History Museum (ITN News)
Click to expand
Dunn family 'vindicated' after meeting with Shadow ministers
The Dunn family spokesman says they feel they have been "listened to" and "vindicated". Radd Seiger and Harry Dunn's parents met Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry and Shadow Attorney General Shami Chakrabarti on Tuesday afternoon.
Researchers looked at more than two million animals at the Natural History Museum, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington DC, the Field Museum in Chicago, the American Museum of Natural History in New York and the French National Museum of Natural History.
Male birds outnumbered females by 60 per cent to 40 per cent, while mammals were 52 per cent male.
Gallery: The world's most beautiful museums (Love Exploring)
Museums are home to so-called reference animals – the official specimen for each species to which new animals must be compared.
Among these important animals, only 27 per cent of birds and 39 per cent of mammals were female.
Perhaps it's the peacock's showy tail, the lion's mane and the antlers grown by stags that can make them bigger crowd-pleasers.
The problem, according to researchers, is that leaving out female members of the animal kingdom may be bad for science.
It is harder to classify females into the correct species when there are not many to refer to.
The study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B calls for this to be redressed.
Study author Dr Natalie Cooper, of the Natural History Museum, said: 'There is a tendency for the people collecting to want to get the largest grizzly bear or the animal with the most impressive horns.'
An ostrich on display at the Natural History Museum in London. A study of five museums found that women weren't the only females forced to fight sexism
The animals were collected between 1751 and 2018, but things didn't get better with time. Dr Cooper said: 'Interestingly, we see no improvement. Even recent collections are biased.
and not just me
have far too much time on their hands
Natural History Museum is branded sexist...
for not having enough female animal exhibits
Victoria Allen Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail
18 hrs ago
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
© Bikeworldtravel The Natural History Museum is one of the most favorite museum for tourist in London.Although progress is being made against sexism, there are still pockets of resistance... such as among long-dead exhibits at the Natural History Museum.
A study of five museums found that women weren't the only females forced to fight sexism – apparently leopards and lions face it, too, with the famous London collection and others accused of being prejudiced.
File video: Duchess of Cambridge visits the Natural History Museum (ITN News)
Click to expand
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Dunn family 'vindicated' after meeting with Shadow ministers
The Dunn family spokesman says they feel they have been "listened to" and "vindicated". Radd Seiger and Harry Dunn's parents met Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry and Shadow Attorney General Shami Chakrabarti on Tuesday afternoon.
You must log in or register to see images
Researchers looked at more than two million animals at the Natural History Museum, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History in Washington DC, the Field Museum in Chicago, the American Museum of Natural History in New York and the French National Museum of Natural History.
Male birds outnumbered females by 60 per cent to 40 per cent, while mammals were 52 per cent male.
Gallery: The world's most beautiful museums (Love Exploring)
You must log in or register to see images
Museums are home to so-called reference animals – the official specimen for each species to which new animals must be compared.
Among these important animals, only 27 per cent of birds and 39 per cent of mammals were female.
You must log in or register to see images
The Natural History Museum on 16, February 2011 in London. (Photo by Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)Perhaps it's the peacock's showy tail, the lion's mane and the antlers grown by stags that can make them bigger crowd-pleasers.
The problem, according to researchers, is that leaving out female members of the animal kingdom may be bad for science.
You must log in or register to see images
© Provided by Associated Newspapers Limited Mane man: A lion exhibit at the Natural History Museum in LondonIt is harder to classify females into the correct species when there are not many to refer to.
The study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B calls for this to be redressed.
You must log in or register to see images
© Provided by Associated Newspapers Limited Brown bear on display at the Natural History Museum in London. It is harder to classify females into the correct species when there are not many to refer toStudy author Dr Natalie Cooper, of the Natural History Museum, said: 'There is a tendency for the people collecting to want to get the largest grizzly bear or the animal with the most impressive horns.'
You must log in or register to see images
© Provided by Associated Newspapers LimitedAn ostrich on display at the Natural History Museum in London. A study of five museums found that women weren't the only females forced to fight sexism
The animals were collected between 1751 and 2018, but things didn't get better with time. Dr Cooper said: 'Interestingly, we see no improvement. Even recent collections are biased.