It looks like the risk has been reduced because it provides that if the EU acts in bad faith in future trade negotiations or does not use best endeavours to reach such an agreement, thus holding the UK indefinitely in the back stop, this gives the UK grounds to leave the backstop
But absent bad faith, the UK's position to be kept in the backstop is unchanged
Okay, sorry another question...who decides that "the EU acted in bad faith"...the ECJ.
Who is the arbitor, is basically my question?