The rules should be like they were in the 70's.
Think we've had this debate before mate...
How do you stop the game? Does the ball need to be out of play? If not how is the game fairly restarted?
Assuming the ball must be dead is there a time limit? Can the play go on for 5-10 minutes before it's pulled back?
If any card offences are commited in the time period talked about above are they then taken away if the previous decision is altered?
Whose decision is it to review? Officials or managers?
It works brilliantly in other sports where there are natural breaks but that isn't the case with football.
Plenty of people are always saying how it needs to come but I've yet to see a clear plan that addresses all the potential problems imo.
How to stop the game? Simple, ref blows his whistle, like normal.
He Then asks the fourth official to replay the incident, asking him what he sees. Offside, not offside, etc....
So every decision he's unsure of he stops play?
Sounds painfully ****e tbh mate.
No, not every one. But possible red cards, offside goals, etc...
Most decisions take a matter of seconds to decide...
How to stop the game? Simple, ref blows his whistle, like normal.
He Then asks the fourth official to replay the incident, asking him what he sees. Offside, not offside, etc....
Not feeling it personally, it will end up coming eventually though.
Half way there already with goal line tech.
What even if the ball is in play?
What if the other team breaks 3 on 2 then it's pulled back and decision was right in first place?
Hardly fair and you can't give that advantage back.
Not having a go mate, if there's a way it can work then fair enough bring it in but it's far from 'simple' as you put it.
I also feel that after a while the refs would be reviewing almost everything but that's a bit of a different debate tbh.
Edit- Also I'm glad you mention the 4th official is that who should make the final call in your mind? Some say there should be 3 people making decisions which I don't agree with as different people have different interpretations.
Probably mate...
But goal line tech is different as it's black and white, no interpretation required and crucially no need to pause the game.
Fouls, offsides, handballs & cards a whole different ball game.
Refs do it all the time. Blow the whistle and stop the game..
I understand what you're saying about the fourth official. But in these cases, he has the best view, and from different angles.
In RFU, it's put up on the big screen so the ref can see it for himself. Whether they'd allow that in football, I'm not so sure...
Yeah they stop the game when a decision is made...
But what about the situation I've described above? Surely it's grossly unfair to stop a promising position if there wasn't a decision to be made anyway.
Rugby is a poor comparison as it's very stop/start anyway. Football isn't... and making it so wouls ruin it imo.
We'll agree to disagree.
In my view, it's coming, like it or not. There's too much money in the game nowadays to be having crucial points won or lost on the whim of ****wits like Moss, or Marriner...

I'm against it. I like the controversy involved in football, call me old fashioned but **** off with a virtual ref.

Think we've had this debate before mate...
How do you stop the game? Does the ball need to be out of play? If not how is the game fairly restarted?
Assuming the ball must be dead is there a time limit? Can the play go on for 5-10 minutes before it's pulled back?
If any card offences are commited in the time period talked about above are they then taken away if the previous decision is altered?
Whose decision is it to review? Officials or managers?
It works brilliantly in other sports where there are natural breaks but that isn't the case with football.
Plenty of people are always saying how it needs to come but I've yet to see a clear plan that addresses all the potential problems imo.


