1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Omega Man does one.

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by The Omega Man, Sep 16, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ....

    .... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    334
    Think I know what it is about and I know where your coming from ... when a MOD decides to get personal and not do anything about other people getting personal because of "what side of the fence they sit to do with the big issue" you know this forum is going one way and one way only ...

    tbh this forum has gone to **** because the mods only allow one side of any argument ,.... their side ... it is quite frankly wrong
     
    #41
  2. AttilaTheHen

    AttilaTheHen Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    you seem to getaway with your side and no mods stopping you.
     
    #42
  3. Benjo

    Benjo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,323
    Likes Received:
    3,236
    That's not the case at all. This thread is here and the pro name changers spout loads of **** for free with no action against it other than debate. Some posters might get insulting sometimes but seriously... this is the internet, just grow some bollocks. They wouldn't say it to you in person and you should realise that.

    Yesterday someone accused ctwd of treating fans with opposing views offensively and then proceeded to call them ****s in the same sentence... he didn't even spot the irony!

    Pro name changers start incredibly goading threads and have the same tone to a lot of their posts. There's a traditional upper middle class smug ****ishness about many of their posts and I can't believe they complain when people bicker back. It's just wumming and it's exactly the response most of them desire.

    Oh, and you're a soppy bastard... ban me.
     
    #43
  4. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,363
    See ya Mel. Have a break, come back at some point if you fancy it, I will miss your posts, I've enjoyed discussing all sorts with you over our time on here.
     
    #44
  5. Sir Cheshire Ben

    Sir Cheshire Ben Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Messages:
    23,678
    Likes Received:
    27,241
    Can somebody please explain the other side of the argument? I did ask last night & on many other occasions but nobody ever responds. Many questions have been put to the PL AA brigade yet they only respond when people get annoyed at their lack of reasoned debate.

    Here's a few.

    Originally Posted by Spanish Tiger
    "you will never get that while those ( REAL FANS hahaha) at CTWD are taking breath they see themselves as the ones. to save the club.. Surely they should realise that our history will never fade and they should be proud and go forward with the club and they can then say I was there when we had those times good and bad."


    What does the club need saving from?

    We, as in Hull City AFC, nickname The Tigers, are in a period of growth both on & off the pitch. We have reached the final of the FA Cup & qualified for Europe (although this mattered little to the "The Premier League is all that matters" brigade). We finished in our highest ever position last season & have strengthened the team in a positive attempt to improve further. We made a profit of over £8m last year, our income has increased to a level we've never witnessed before. Sponsorship deals have been signed that are in excess of any the club have had before. All achieved as Hull City AFC, nickname The Tigers.

    The only thing I see the club need saving from is an owner who has lost sight of reality to such an extent that he has misled, abused, disenfranchised & lied to his long term customer base in an arrogant attempt to sate his narrow minded & short sighted ego. He has let, initially one & now two, petty squabbles (initially refusing to let go of a childish spat with the local council & now he considers his ego to have been dented by the sport's governing body refusing his request to change the club's name for what they consider no valid reason) get in the way of progressing the club further in a mature & responsible fashion.

    What are your thoughts regarding why you think CTWD need to save the club?

    & another


    Originally Posted by ollyhcafc
    "The council are to blame why would they reject development around the stadium absolutely embarrassing."


    Have you seen the planning application that was rejected?

    & another

    Originally Posted by mark KC
    "Those 3000 fans didnt renew despite knowing that the FA had rejected the name change so the two are not related.
    I know a few season ticket holders who didn't renew and it was all to do with the price increases. That is not someone f**ing up, that is just the cost of participating in the most watched league in the world. The price of success."


    Is that success achieved as Hull City AFC, nickname The Tigers?

    Why would any company, whatever the business, rebrand when they are achieving their greatest ever success?

    There are literally dozens of these unanswered & ignored questions, all that's offered are generic "typical response from the anti Allams, no answer & reply with insults & abuse" from the usual ill informed & ignorant Premier League Whores.

    EDIT: If you coming back brings back Stan, then please come back Mel. The board will be a worse place without you both.
     
    #45
  6. Chazz Rheinhold

    Chazz Rheinhold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    58,295
    Likes Received:
    55,788
    Dunno whats gone on Mel but get your arse back on here you write some excellent stuff, always well worth reading.
     
    #46
  7. ....

    .... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,336
    Likes Received:
    334
    It was on a deleted thread last night when DMD and another started using personal information against me (or who they thought was me) and Omega questioned it and I am guessing ended up as I thought it would ...

    sad really
     
    #47
  8. AttilaTheHen

    AttilaTheHen Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    this forum is a barroload of monkeys isnt it
     
    #48
  9. mauled1904

    mauled1904 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,389
    Likes Received:
    702
    To be fair this isn't far off the truth, I was really suprised when another CTWD advocate was made a mod as there is no balance to the site.
     
    #49
  10. Chazz Rheinhold

    Chazz Rheinhold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    58,295
    Likes Received:
    55,788
    They dont delete threads here, we've been told that as a fact.
     
    #50

  11. Carmine Galante.

    Carmine Galante. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    12,772
    Likes Received:
    6,253
    Ain't that the truth.
     
    #51
  12. DMD

    DMD Eh?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    68,416
    Likes Received:
    60,191

    <laugh>


    Did I bollocks. I repeated some claims YOU had posted you nugget.
     
    #52
  13. Fez

    Fez Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    13,622
    Likes Received:
    5,161
    Why was the thread deleted instead of closing it and leaving it so we could all see what was wrong? Was there something so bad in it, so much worse than the day-to-day crap that is ignored? Was personal information detailed in the public domain?
     
    #53
  14. Walter Sobchak

    Walter Sobchak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    5,589
    Likes Received:
    5,602
    Lost all respect for omega now.
     
    #54
  15. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,604
    Likes Received:
    75,769
    The reason this particular mod can't really be arsed to debate with you, is because you're a ranty, slightly stupid individual, who never listens to the points put forward anyway, you just get more ranty and frankly, I've got better things to do with my time.

    Your posts aren't deleted, you're free to keep ranting, but I'm under no obligation to waste my time going round in circles with someone who never listens.

    Carry on.
     
    #55
  16. Murdoc

    Murdoc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,631
    Likes Received:
    166
    Reverse psychology ;)
     
    #56
  17. FILEYseadog

    FILEYseadog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,767
    Likes Received:
    4,685
    Yes Iv always liked reading Mel's both sides of the arguments posts

    I have also never seen him post insults or curse at other posters views .
     
    #57
  18. The Omega Man

    The Omega Man Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    8,278
    Likes Received:
    5,664
    I have been asked by several posters, Pm's, emails and telephone calls to explain why, I have decided to leave and after reading some of the posts, there may be some confusion as to why.

    Firstly, I decision is nothing to do with the debate over the name change or CTWD or Monday night. It is nothing to do with abusive posts on either side. I am not fed up with the banter, the slating or the wind up's.

    The simple fact is that a wind up merchant "..." posted a thread. DMD became engaged in it and posted about how "..." had lost his job. At one point he mentioned something along the lines of "your family must be proud of you". I felt that this was beyond the pale. The thread had nothing to do with employment or families and even though there had been sometime ago a heated discussion about what had and happened to "...", I do not believe that it is anything to do with a: the thread and b: this forum.
    At no point was I abusive, I simply asked DMD the question "What on earth has it to do with the OP?" His answer was that it was in the public domain and that "..." had posted about it himself (but he had not posted it on that thread). I still cannot see that someone getting the sack has anything to do with the name change debate and even if they are not a poster that I have anytime for, I do not feel that any other poster has the right to drag someones employment or family into the debate.
    DMD turned this all around into me being abusive, the original thread was taken down. I put up a thread asking why and that to was taken down. I received a PM from DMD in which he repeated that the stuff about "..." is/was in the public domain. He misses the point. He introduced it into a thread and used it to attack another poster. He would not answer and still has not answered the question "What did it have to do with the OP".
    It became clear to me that DMD operates a form of censorship of any threads or posts that he see's a damaging to himself. He hides behind his position as a Mod. this complaint has been levied about him in the past and he uses the terms "tidying up". But the fact is that I consider his actions to be self centered. He does not moderate, he eliminates and destroys freedom of speech.
    In my op I said that if I post the reason why, my posts will be deleted, so lets see. There will be no circular arguement from me that revolves around DMD's failure to answer my question. This is purely a statement by me of my reason for leaving the site.
    Oh just one thing, my account has been open on several devices, I also stayed logged on because I had PM's, I am not lurking in the background, I will still read threads on here, just not contribute beyond this. Thanks once again.
     
    #58
  19. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    38,390
    Likes Received:
    19,718
    Welcome to the usual suspects.

    Make yourself at home, please.
     
    #59
  20. DMD

    DMD Eh?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    68,416
    Likes Received:
    60,191
    Omega,

    I answered your questions at the time and have answered them again since. I can't help it if you didn't like the answers.

    I've tried explaining that you missed the other threads deleted by other mods that the one in question related to, so the 'OP' you refer to isn't the OP at all. The clue was in the title request for the thread not to be deleted.

    The comments I made were in deed only a repetition of posts that dotty had made, the point being he was accusing other people of deceit and dishonesty and manipulation of the truth, when he himself is guilty of doing exactly that.

    I deleted your second thread because to answer it would raise the very issues that caused you to comment in the first place and which you felt shouldn't be on a forum. I thought a full reply via PM was more appropriate.

    You chose to ignore those points, and made allegations against me, as you have in that reply, that are abusive and insulting.

    Had you not got involved, the thread would have been deleted as it was, as you say just a tedious wum. It stayed so I could answer your questions rather than leave you up in the air with the wrong idea of what it was all about.
     
    #60
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page