The Official Suarez "our ****" Thread (closing this thread at noon so get commenting)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Any views on this?

Was that aimed at me?
If so, my answer is no, I have no views on it because I'm not clairvoyant and don't profess to know what is going on in someone else's mind. Especially not one as bizarre and muddled as Suarez' would appear to be.
Anyone who claims to know what he was thinking is being, quite frankly, absurd.
 
Was that aimed at me?
If so, my answer is no, I have no views on it because I'm not clairvoyant and don't profess to know what is going on in someone else's mind. Especially not one as bizarre and muddled as Suarez' would appear to be.
Anyone who claims to know what he was thinking is being, quite frankly, absurd.

Nope, not aimed at you specifically Saint, it is just my opinion given the timing and placing of the incidents so was curious if anyone had a view on it.
 
Did he do it in front of a copper?

He said she said can lead to a slap on the knuckles but not in front of a multitude of police officers as was the case with Cantona.

Cantona was racially abused by the victim like......

Par
 

I've seen that and it just doesn't explain what a 'worldwide ban' actually is.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/27/newsid_2506000/2506237.stm

This bbc article "Cantona has also been stripped of his captaincy of the French national team and he has lost his place in the side" makes it sound as if he's just been dropped by the manager and not being picked anymore because how could someone be dropped from a side they are banned from?

And then on his wiki it says "The Football Association then increased the ban to eight months (up to and including 30 September 1995) and fined him a further £10,000. The FA Chief Executive Graham Kelly described his attack as "a stain on our game" that brought shame on football. FIFA then confirmed the suspension as worldwide, meaning that Cantona couldn't escape the ban by transferring to a foreign club" which again insinuates that it was worldwide at club level.
 
Did he do it in front of a copper?

He said she said can lead to a slap on the knuckles but not in front of a multitude of police officers as was the case with Cantona.

Must be honest here and say no, it was in a club, though he did admit it at trial but said the bouncer was being agressive towards him <ok>
 
Any views on this?

I posted that he knows exactly what he's doing. I lump it with his dramatic flair in other on field gestures, as he tries to do anything possible to give his side an advantage (bar causing injury, as he's not that type of dirty). We interprete the bite as crazy since we are so "civilised", but "uncivilised" beings do more often actually act out of calculation than craziness.
 
Mitigating evidence?

Hahahahaha, I thought you were better than that

The man's a total bell end lad, there's no mitigating evidence at all. He s a ****ing dolt who reacts the same way when things are going against him and he gets frustrated.

Maybe, just maybe, if you lot had actually berated him for his ****ish and totally unacceptable behaviour previously, he wouldn't have given a post match interview yesterday saying it was "just part of the game", which showed he'd learnt **** all from his previous experiences. because he was made to feel that he was guilty of nothing........

You don't think Uruguay's ridiculous pandering is more likely responsible for his blase attitude? The entire country is feeding his persecution complex and telling him he's done nothing wrong. The truth is this **** has nothing to do with Liverpool and everything to do with Suarez being a head case. Any attempt to implicate Liverpool in this is pretty desperate.
 
I've seen that and it just doesn't explain what a 'worldwide ban' actually is.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/27/newsid_2506000/2506237.stm

This bbc article "Cantona has also been stripped of his captaincy of the French national team and he has lost his place in the side" makes it sound as if he's just been dropped by the manager and not being picked anymore because how could someone be dropped from a side they are banned from?

And then on his wiki it says "The Football Association then increased the ban to eight months (up to and including 30 September 1995) and fined him a further £10,000. The FA Chief Executive Graham Kelly described his attack as "a stain on our game" that brought shame on football. FIFA then confirmed the suspension as worldwide, meaning that Cantona couldn't escape the ban by transferring to a foreign club" which again insinuates that it was worldwide at club level.

It was a ban that was upheld worldwide by FIFA, it ain't complicated.
 
I've seen that and it just doesn't explain what a 'worldwide ban' actually is.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/27/newsid_2506000/2506237.stm

This bbc article "Cantona has also been stripped of his captaincy of the French national team and he has lost his place in the side" makes it sound as if he's just been dropped by the manager and not being picked anymore because how could someone be dropped from a side they are banned from?

And then on his wiki it says "The Football Association then increased the ban to eight months (up to and including 30 September 1995) and fined him a further £10,000. The FA Chief Executive Graham Kelly described his attack as "a stain on our game" that brought shame on football. FIFA then confirmed the suspension as worldwide, meaning that Cantona couldn't escape the ban by transferring to a foreign club" which again insinuates that it was worldwide at club level.

Pretty sure a world wide football ban excludes you from any oficially sanctioned game including charity matches.
 
You don't think Uruguay's ridiculous pandering is more likely responsible for his blase attitude? The entire country is feeding his persecution complex and telling him he's done nothing wrong. The truth is this **** has nothing to do with Liverpool and everything to do with Suarez being a head case. Any attempt to implicate Liverpool in this is pretty desperate.

You lot wore the T shirts after he racially abused a player and then made out his bite was worthy of less than a bad challenge last time out. You can't pass the blame for his seeming reluctance to accept any form of wrong doing to Uruguay because it suits
 
Nope, not aimed at you specifically Saint, it is just my opinion given the timing and placing of the incidents so was curious if anyone had a view on it.

Fair enough.
My answer still stands. I don't believe anyone can know what went on in his mind and claim to know his motivation.
My opinion is that he has a rush of blood to the head and can't control himself- a fact which concerns me more than if it was premeditated because it would mean he is more likely to do it again in the future.
 
It was a ban that was upheld worldwide by FIFA, it ain't complicated.

You haven't actually replied to the BBC article that said he had lost his place in the French side, rather than banned from playing for them. Explain this without deflecting the question or changing the course of the discussion.
 
<laugh>

Did he get an onion or a clove of garlic thrown at him ala Digger Barnes and bananagate at Woodison.<whistle>

No he got called a ****ing French whatever by the right wing tit who he twatted

Barnes got his first taste of bananas from you lot anyway - just to make him feel at home....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.