Now I really don't like Stuart Hall so I'll make that clear before I start. I feel that he is just a verbose buffon. However in both his half time and full time reports on today's match he made a point of blaming Sterling for the injury to Watson.
Martinez like Whelan is a whinger. http://www1.skysports.com/football/...-not-happy-with-Liverpool-forward-Luis-Suarez
It's almost worth it if you win, but a 46-0 paggering...! I never minded Stuart Hall. I grew up with his It's a Knock Out commentaries so I quite like him, really. He also makes a change from most commentators, whose entire vocabulary can usually fit inside a pixie's thimble...But, that being said, if he said there was intent on Raheem's part then he's a complete c*nt-hole!
Think Suarez was very lucky not to get sent off for that lunge yesterday. Why does he have to mar his great performances so?
I think if it had been anyone else there would have been very little attention and if noticed it would have been a yellow or harsh red. yes it was a bit naughty but so were a lot of the "follow throughs" from wigan during the game, don't fall for the pantomime bad guy role the media have created for Suarez.
Your right, its just the anti Surez thing. The fact that the BBC promote it is disgraceful considering they have rules about being neutral, which they have regularly broken regarding Suarez (and Barton). I dont even think it was naughty of such. It was clumsy and poorly timed. It wasn't done in malice. I'v lost quite a bit of respect for the way he has to balance compliments for Suarez with negatives. If he cant find a negative he over exaggerates some thing or brings up some thing from a previous came. I think its incredibly unprofessional by him.
