The Official Man Utd & Liverpool plus Chelsea, Everton and City Banter Thread!

I remember you then. Times move on.

 

Maybe, except Mancini saying himself and the fact they have been beaten to players and shown **** all interest in anyone despite it being clear they needed improving in some areas.

Perhaps they will wait til the last day of the window so it makes it more of a show.

Come the first game of the season, if they sign a player for over £10million without selling I will be very surprised.

Also, if they want a player they will get him...... erm.....no................ and that is my point. They wanted Hazard, they didnt get. They were out financed by Chelsea.

 

so have you spoken with every fan? You really do make some sweeping statements. A Dortmund fan posted an essay, so what. He is too lightweight to play in the premier league, United's rigid f4-4-2 will not suit him. he was bought to sell shirts, and you will not win back the league.

 

Beaten for every player? They wanted Hazard? They have no money? You really do talk some bollox at times.

 

Are you genuinely thick or is it an act? Serious question. I and others would like to know!

First of all, 2 lightweight, yes because that bucked tooth gimp of yours is a ****ing giant isnt he, or Sva at City is massive. Keane, scholes, Wise, Zola and many more show that tired old argument is about as true as your skin is blue.

Secondly being a United fan and keeping tab on whats going on at the club I and **** loads more of us can see plain as day that we will be playing 451/4231/433 for much of the coming season. Kagawa will fit in perfectly. Even in a 442 he fits in as the 2nd striker with ease. So **** all issue ther.

Finally, to sell shirts. On last seasons record and considering the fairly similar roles they play.......... hes better than the bucked tooth gimp you have so not bad for a shirt seller.

 

Oh did they go for someone else this summer or am I correct in saying they were beaten to their one and only target of the summer so far. Because they couldnt or wouldnt put up the funds.

Weird isnt it that the worlds richest club cant afford the funds to buy a player.

Or perhaps its because they have no spendable cash available unless they sell.

 

I must have missed the point when the transfer window closed then.

 

Last summer if RVP had said he was leaving Arsenal he would be a City player by now. The fact that they are only being linked in a few papers and nothing more than heresay points to the fact they are not the financial force of 12 months ago.

Perhaps they dont want RVP, perhaps they are happy with the squad and perhaps Mancini saying he must buy players to win the title next season was just him getting confused.

Perhaps baz, perhaps.

Or maybe not....

We shall see what unfolds over the next 54 days, like I said though, I dont think they will sign anyone of note without selling.

 

http://whatculture.com/sport/manchester-city-transfer-news-nani-to-cross-manchester.php

Looks like Nani is on the list.

 

Lol


Except hes in Singapore and his agents in talks with United right now over a new contract.

Plus like we would ever sell to City, it would cost their owners their entire wealth to buy our worst players never mind our best.

 

City are looking to trim there wage bill before the introduction of FFP. They will however spend, and spend big. There owners are amongst the richest people in the world. To suggest they have run out of money is simply ludicrous. You are either on the wind up, stupid or highly deluded.

 

Tevez<cough>

 

There's a word for this sentence, what is it?

Oh yeah, that's it. Ironic.

 

Was he not out of contract?

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jul/06/manchester-city-robin-van-persie?newsfeed=true

 

Citys owners have no money problems but they are not bound by financial rulings like City...

 

Well put saint. Swarbs will be crying into his haggis over the defeat of Murray now. At leaset the Englishman and the Dane who won the men's doubles yesterday are both LFC supporters

 

LOL

erm no...

 

Thanks for proving my point. They must sell before they buy.

 

No, they would like to move some big earners off there books before FFP kicks in.