If what he's implying is true (and he has the backing of RTC) then it'll be ****ing rivetting <sic> alright
Is he asking all those questions hoping that someone else will answer them? If he knows the answers to his endless questions, then why doesn't he just post them? Does he like WWE?
I don't know. Maybe? Somebody made an interesting enough attempt to do so, in any event, offering a (probably only temporary) counterbalance: http://rangerstaxcase.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/a-permanent-embarrassment-and-an-occasional-disgrace/comment-page-19/#comment-103399 It's quite long, for those who may become agitated and distressed reading more than a paragraph of plain text (there seems to be a lot of it about) and my use of the word "interesting" is, of course, entirely subjective. (I hope the link works, apologies in advance if it doesn't.)
That was a good counter to the original post although his example of Souness getting money through EBTs possibly being a good thing as it encourages current employees to work harder to receive such future rewards seems a tad unlikely. This is the smoking gun, of course, and it is what I think barcabhoy is implying although he's being necessarily over-cautious.
Agreed. That felt like it was stretching credulity too far, although I think he was merely perhaps saying that this may be an argument forwarded by other people. Given the state of the world, I think it's not hard to imagine someone attempting such a line of defence/justification. Yes. It certainly looks very, very bad (on the surface) and I can't imagine that this will end well. I'm not sure I understand why he is being "necessarily over-cautious", however, although I'm presently happy enough to trust that these people know what they're doing and why they're doing it.
