Faurlin was seen at Reading the week before but doesn't mean he was joining them? Although a few deluded Reading fans thought so. But get your point. It was probably Tony Blair that was seen and the time it got back ended being Anelka? Shame it was Rooney> Nice one Staines
Sorry Cerny, you've converted me into a non-believer. To me it looks like you felt threatened by Mango's news and the sense that it could be a big piece of inside info so you cryptically decided to leap on the bandwagon and say that you too knew what was going. That was blown out the water by Mango's sad news and honourable charity day. Now you come on here and say something overt relating to something that might happen in 3 months time but you admit might not. Why cryptic 3 days ago but not now? You wouldn't by any chance be trying to save face. I now think you have as much foreknowledge of QPR as Mother Teresa had of the secret meetings of Churchill's war cabinet.
Protecting them from what? A distant hint of a rumour of a deal will get blown out of the water because you mention it 3 days early (but unsurprisingly can tell us as soon as other big news is revealed). You're the only person who's mentioned Anelka. Your "source" will know that YOU've leaked it. Anelka's moved so many times that he won't care either.
A rumour is a rumour there is no set in stone code of conduct unless of course you are proposing one matt?
Why is he getting a hard time? I posted the Berbatov to QPR thread the other day. Will we see either of them? Probably not, but that doesn't mean our ambitious owners aren't putting feelers out.
That's true and we all appreciate it but people ITK should realise that they need to make a distinction between inside info and rumour. This Anelka thing was leaked like insider stuff the other day with cryptic clues and is now declared to be a rumour now. Either is fine and, as a fellow fan, I'd welcome his thoughts rather than him just being a supplier of near facts (ie what does he personally think or feel) but we need some distinction between them all.
I think its because hes trying desperately to make himself feel important. I don't know why people indulge this self-absorbed muppet.
Being a self-absorbed muppet desperately trying to sound important can be a tad annoying. I realize I've left myself wide open to attack now!
Agree Northolt but the same can be said about people who disagree. If it is okay to spread 'utter tosh rumours' then surely it is okay to say that person is talking B####### as well? I have nothing against CB and in the past have enjoyed his posts but when in 2 days he quotes: "Announcement re GP" "An application has been made to acquire land as well" and "Statement regarding Gianni" as well as "Striker inbound" which have all ended up wrong complete rubbish you sort of ask yourself why he does it? If he is passing info on, maybe he should start the post with something like; I have a rumour which is complete rubbish but the info was passed onto me by someone and i promise not to play with the minds of other posters by hinting it's legit. or something along those lines because you have heard the saying 'Cry wolf'. Anyway a rumour is a rumour,
