H
Hoddle is a god
Guest
I paid something in installments once with the Argos catelogue, quite handy really.
You little wizard!
I paid something in installments once with the Argos catelogue, quite handy really.
City loaned him and then sold him to Spurs, while agreeing to pay a significant part of his wages, if reports are to be believed.As I understand it, the Man City arrangement was different as he was still under contract with Man City and loaned to Spurs. Because they were so desperate to get rid of him, they agreed to pay part of his wages whilst he was at Spurs (something like £40k I believe)
If however his contract has been terminated, then the severance package wouldn't necessarily be subject to the same rules. In essence, the club and his agent could negotiate any deal they want, seeing as he's not bound by club contract. If as is being reported, then this means he's being paid in full by Spurs, with the option for another club to pay a proportion of that £100k
... If as is being reported, then this means he's being paid in full by Spurs, with the option for another club to pay a proportion of that £100k
City loaned him and then sold him to Spurs, while agreeing to pay a significant part of his wages, if reports are to be believed.
The rules have apparently changed about clubs being able to pay players that they don't own now, though.
You've still failed to address my point about any club agreeing to pay him anything.
If Spurs don't own him and can't control his registration, then why would the club signing him agree to any fee?
They could enter negotiations, fail to come to an agreement and pay the player nothing.
If there is a clause, then it must say something about payment amounts or it's pointless.
Either Spurs can pull the plug on any deal, which doesn't sound like a termination or there's an amount set for wages.
It wouldn't even surprise me if Adebayor gets some of it, to give him an incentive to sign up.
How would the "other" club be bound by a contract that Ade has with Spurs?
Read that back and then face palm yourself into unconsciousness, please.As I've said, it could quite easily have been stipulated in the severance deal, that any club signing him up would have to negotiate with Levy about how much of the £100k they pay. It doesn't matter about whether Spurs control his registration, it's all down to what legal documents were signed as part of the severance package.
If a club enter negotiations with him, fail to come to an agreement, then it would seem that it would default to the original agreement that Spurs continue to pay him in full until summer 2016
Grow up will you. I posted a link to a story and you've had a little hissy fit about it, claiming it was rubbish and started blathering on about me needing to see a psychiatrist. When I've asked you for evidence of your claim that both the club and Adebayor have said this isn't the case, you haven't been able to.
Read that back and then face palm yourself into unconsciousness, please.
The agreement would literally give Spurs no ability to negotiate with the hypothetical club.
What would be the point in it?
Read that back and then face palm yourself into unconsciousness, please.
The agreement would literally give Spurs no ability to negotiate with the hypothetical club.
What would be the point in it?
I'm just trying to work out if he can see the obvious flaw in what he's saying.There's no point trying to debate with him, he's always right even when he's not - which is most of the time!..
It's YOU that needs to grow up, pal...

And it makes no sense whatsoever, does it? What does that tell you?I don't need to facepalm myself at all. Spurs could quite easily have stipulated that as part of Adebayor's severance, they will pay him £100k per week and that (as part of that deal) if he signs for another club, then that club have to negotiate with Levy.
That is what is being reported
I'm just trying to work out if he can see the obvious flaw in what he's saying.
Is he just ignoring the ridiculousness of it or does he not see why it's ridiculous?
That would be like negotiating with you on a job offer for me.There is no flaw though, it all depends on what was agreed in that severance deal. It could quite easily have stipulated what is being reported, that should he sign for another club, then they (as part of that deal) have to negotiate with Levy about how much of that £100k they pay.
And it makes no sense whatsoever, does it? What does that tell you?
He doesn't have a contract with Spurs...
That would be like negotiating with you on a job offer for me.
The company would agree with me, phone you up and say that they didn't want to pay you anything and then put the phone down.
What would be the point in that clause?
Then why are we still paying him any money?
I'm just trying to work out if he can see the obvious flaw in what he's saying....?
Don't tell him, PNP!
Let's wait and see if the penny drops!