And you said Villa because 1 you spend so much time in Germany, you can't remember English clubs names anymore. 2 you suffer from dementia 3 you're just another thick millwall fan. 4You come from Pakistan and you're still learning the lingo.
What I actually said was you lot cheered when he dived last season against Villa which is why he's still doing it this season - please keep up or keep out
Evening guys been listening to the arguments re Bamford or Eddie and I'm firmly in the Eddie camp. I don't think bielsa will start Eddie over Bamford this weekend and I think this may be the start of all bielsa's good work starting to unravel. Looking at the next 3 matches I can't see us winning any of them, Birmingham feels like it will be a smash and grab jutkiewitz as usual with the winner. Preston on Tuesday think we could get soundly beaten there the way they are playing. That leaves Sheffield Wednesday next Saturday and you just know monk will put one over on bielsa. If anything like the above does happen then bielsa is under serious pressure and as we all know it doesn't take much for him to seek pastures new. Anyway it's just a feeling hope it's completely wrong but small cracks do seem to be appearing so now is the time for bielsa to show us he's more than just hype.
No confusion here, but to clear it up for you - Barn door Bamford banned for cheating against Villa - cheats again against Derby, but Leeds fans feel hard done by when ref correctly gives a penalty against them
Think you already know we won't be going up 64 west brom , Fulham autos and Bristol city via playoffs for me
Fook that's long winded, why didn't you just say you got it all wrong from the start. We should have had 3 pens against Derby, and the only pen at millwall wasn't given, the refs stood down this w/e for cheating for millwall.You're not called Southern softies for nothing I suppose, if you lived in Thailand you would all be lady boys.
Then why ****ing bring him in? Why bring in a player that doesn’t fit your system? And lastly, who in the future is more likely to play up front for Arsenal, Eddie or Bamford? (All questions not opinions)
Sadly I think the problem was that we needed to bring in a 2nd striker. We were linked to enough of them over the summer. They brought in someone who scores for fun. If we didn't need that from a striker then what do we want from one? I think the question should be which one of them is going to play for the Senior England side in the future and it's obvious that the answer is not Bamford.
That's a fair question. May have been better off bringing in a striker whose style closely resembles that of Roofe's. Someone who, if Bielsa felt that Bamford needed a rest or needed dropping, could just slot in seamlessly without the need to change the system or formation.
Yes he was... the fact that Kompany wanted him over Bamford speaks volumes. The problem is that Orta signed him at Boro and felt he would be a good fit with us..... WRONG!!!!... Didn't Bamford make a comment about us the fans being Scum?
If Bielsa was such a great footballing brain he would be able to bring in player who could play different styles of football and change the system accordingly as of when he needs.
He's doing great considering he inherited a **** team that had just finished 13th, had no money to spend, and took virtually the same **** team to within a whisker of promotion. Have patience and look at the bigger picture.
I'm not denying he had a crap team when he took over but this guy is meant to be the messiah of football... don't make me laugh. If he's so good then why didn't the likes of West Ham snap him up when they had a chance or Everton. there's a limit to what can be done and sorry unless he changes the way he does stuff then things have to change. They have to change sooner not later. Let's not wait five or six years and hope for the best here. When teams drop down from the Prem with their payments it's going to get harder to get promotion.