The IncorruptibleAddick thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Major
Season Ticket Holder
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


Posts: 1,197
You must log in or register to see images

Feb 3, 2018 at 7:43am
Quote
You must log in or register to see images

Post by Major on Feb 3, 2018 at 7:43am
You must log in or register to see images

Feb 3, 2018 at 1:25am stan said:
You must log in or register to see images

Feb 1, 2018 at 10:48pm Major said:
But at least you NOW 'Understand where the claim of fake news comes from', right?No Major, Ash doesn't understand, and nor do the rest of us. Please enlighten us as to where this first quote of `fake news' materialized?


Also, just for our own curiosity, when was the last time you actually attended a game at The Valley? 1978? Who were the opponents then? And why did you give up on this country and move to Canada? This has to be the most pathetic post of the year so far.
'Our' 'Us'? You seem to represent a whole bunch of people there, Stan, or whatever you are. Tell me who you are and I'll answer your first two questions. People that I know are well aware when I am over to see games. I will be there soon if you'd like to meet up.
As for your last question...... see my first sentence.

**Stan's the man. Williamson could not answer any of the THREE questions pinged at him.
 
Williamson is back posting with the apologists<laugh>.

"I just got so dispririted by the nastiness of the antisemitism incident that I haven't posted for a couple of seasons".
 
Last edited:
The other amusing thing about Nigel is that he doesn’t engage with the pub bores & geeks on ITTV …it’s almost as if they are below his pay grade.

He’s popped his head up again on there to see who’s about, and who he can mix it with .

Resident windbag Grapevine might get one patronising response, but the rest can forget it.

Perhaps the heavy handed Global Moderator might wish to reconsider his banning policy ?
 
Dick Plumb1 said:
That Forum has lost its Mojo. It’s gone all bland. Need us all on there, get some arguments going.
Click to expand...

I am prepared to re-join ITTV on two conditions.

1. All other 606 members incl Elfs are allowed back,

2. A free flowing, no holds barred debate is allowed. No grassing, cry babying, deleting posts and banning. Let the consensus on ITTV from the same 3/4 posters be challenged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dick Plumb1 and ElfsborgAddick
Charles No Likes Hawtrey said:
I am prepared to re-join ITTV on two conditions.

1. All other 606 members incl Elfs are allowed back,

2. A free flowing, no holds barred debate is allowed. No grassing, cry babying, deleting posts and banning. Let the consensus on ITTV from the same 3/4 posters be challenged.
Click to expand...
The good old days when Inkblot moderated it was fantastic, an absolute free for all<laugh>. The apologists were ruined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Royston Hawtrey
ia
New Signing
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


Posts: 3
You must log in or register to see images

yesterday at 6:53pm hongkongaddick, mendonca, and 2 more like this
Quote
You must log in or register to see images

Post by ia on yesterday at 6:53pm
Only the third match I've seen all season (another reason why I've only posted a couple of times over the last two seasons after the shocking blood libel of a virulent anti-semite on here - which to be fair to reams, he dealt with swiftly and decisively)

*****
Classic Williamson nonsense, ignoring the stuff Ivor posts, and who Williamson would certainly not want to be seen with in everyday life.
 
I'm glad to hear Reams won't tolerate Ant-Semitism on his forum.
And that he took swift action to deal with the un-named virulent Anti-Semite.

Seems a bit odd however that IA still chooses to post only a couple of times on ITTV even years after the un-named individual was swiftly dealt with.
Is he concerned that the un-named individual still has some kind of influence over that forum?

I can only reassure him from the point of view of this forum that I would never tolerate any Anti-Semitic abuse of him, or anyone else, being posted on Not606 Charlton.

This forum does not tolerate religion based hatred of anybody.
Neither does it tolerate the incitement to violence against any individual. Including a call for Thomas Sandgaard and his son to be beaten up in a dark alley. When I opposed such a post on ITTV I was attacked by IncorruptibleAddick.
And was then falsely accused of Anti-Semitism by several other members on that forum when I refused to accept those false accusations.

It was that false denunciation which led to me voluntarily leaving ITTV.
Reams took no action against me, I was not banned.
A 'retrospective ban' may nave been imposed because of the false accusations, which I understand have been repeated several times against me by the Global administrator.
The same person who I once vigorously defended as innocent and was being denounced falsely and unfairly, when he was accused of racism by a member of CAST regarding the appointment of Lee Bowyer as CAFC manager a few years earlier than that.
However, such a theoretical ban is academic, in that I will not be returning to that forum ever,
unless all false accusations are withdrawn.

Sadly however, it seems false accusations of religious hatred are still tolerated on ITTV.
I would have hoped for better from it's moderating team.
But if threats of violence against unpopular individuals involved with the Club are tolerated, (and even defended when they are called out) then I am hoping for too much when I expect false denunciation to be dealt with by its moderators, swiftly or otherwise.

Indeed it leads me to wonder whether this 'blood libel' by the unnamed 'virulent Anti-Semite' was yet another example of false accusation.
After all, it happened to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Smudger603 and ElfsborgAddick
lardiman said:
I'm glad to hear Reams won't tolerate Ant-Semitism on his forum.
And that he took swift action to deal with the un-named virulent Anti-Semite.

Seems a bit odd however that IA still chooses to post only a couple of times on ITTV even years after the un-named individual was swiftly dealt with.
Is he concerned that the un-named individual still has some kind of influence over that forum?

I can only reassure him from the point of view of this forum that I would never tolerate any Anti-Semitic abuse of him, or anyone else, being posted on Not606 Charlton.

This forum does not tolerate religion based hatred of anybody.
Neither does it tolerate the incitement to violence against any individual. Including a call for Thomas Sandgaard and his son to be beaten up in a dark alley. When I opposed such a post on ITTV I was attacked by IncorruptibleAddick.
And was then falsely accused of Anti-Semitism by several other members on that forum when I refused to accept those false accusations.

It was that false denunciation which led to me voluntarily leaving ITTV.
Reams took no action against me, I was not banned.
A 'retrospective ban' may nave been imposed because of the false accusations, which I understand have been repeated several times against me by the Global administrator.
The same person who I once vigorously defended as innocent and falsely denounced when he was accused of racism by a member of CAST regarding the appointment of Lee Bowyer as CAFC manager a few years earlier than that.

Sadly, it seems false accusations of religious hatred are tolerated on ITTV.
I would have hoped for better from it's moderating team.
But if threats of violence against unpopular individuals involved with the Club are tolerated, (and even defended when they are called out) then I am hoping for too much when I expect false denunciation to be dealt with by its moderators, swiftly or otherwise.

Indeed it leads me to wonder whether this 'blood libel' by the unnamed 'virulent Anti-Semite' was yet another example of false accusation.
After all, it happened to me.
Click to expand...
They are a very strange bunch.
 
Just a reminder chaps;
I would prefer not to have ITTV material re-posted on this forum if it is a personal attack upon me.

In this case IA's post does not name me, so does not fall into that category.
But (as I did ask a couple of years ago after I left ITTV) I have no interest in knowing anything that is posted there specifically about me.

I never visit that forum anymore even as a guest and I never read any of the content there.
I'm happy to comment on other stuff that gets posted there and then copied here, when that content is amusing or silly enough.
But please don't reproduce anything that refers to me by name.

Thanks <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Royston Hawtrey, ElfsborgAddick, Smudger603 and 1 other person
lardiman said:
I'm glad to hear Reams won't tolerate Ant-Semitism on his forum.
And that he took swift action to deal with the un-named virulent Anti-Semite.

Seems a bit odd however that IA still chooses to post only a couple of times on ITTV even years after the un-named individual was swiftly dealt with.
Is he concerned that the un-named individual still has some kind of influence over that forum?

I can only reassure him from the point of view of this forum that I would never tolerate any Anti-Semitic abuse of him, or anyone else, being posted on Not606 Charlton.

This forum does not tolerate religion based hatred of anybody.
Neither does it tolerate the incitement to violence against any individual. Including a call for Thomas Sandgaard and his son to be beaten up in a dark alley. When I opposed such a post on ITTV I was attacked by IncorruptibleAddick.
And was then falsely accused of Anti-Semitism by several other members on that forum when I refused to accept those false accusations.

It was that false denunciation which led to me voluntarily leaving ITTV.
Reams took no action against me, I was not banned.
A 'retrospective ban' may nave been imposed because of the false accusations, which I understand have been repeated several times against me by the Global administrator.
The same person who I once vigorously defended as innocent and was being denounced falsely and unfairly, when he was accused of racism by a member of CAST regarding the appointment of Lee Bowyer as CAFC manager a few years earlier than that.
However, such a theoretical ban is academic, in that I will not be returning to that forum ever,
unless all false accusations are withdrawn.

Sadly however, it seems false accusations of religious hatred are still tolerated on ITTV.
I would have hoped for better from it's moderating team.
But if threats of violence against unpopular individuals involved with the Club are tolerated, (and even defended when they are called out) then I am hoping for too much when I expect false denunciation to be dealt with by its moderators, swiftly or otherwise.

Indeed it leads me to wonder whether this 'blood libel' by the unnamed 'virulent Anti-Semite' was yet another example of false accusation.
After all, it happened to me.
Click to expand...
I remember the incident. I didn’t see anything wrong about it on your part however it was a pure example of how weaponised language by social engineering resulted in the mind controlled responses and reactions. It worked perfectly for the viewpoint of the social engineers who can pretty much direct public opinion and response in any way they want using the media and nudge units.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lardiman and ElfsborgAddick
Squareball said:
I remember the incident. I didn’t see anything wrong about it on your part however it was a pure example of how weaponised language by social engineering resulted in the mind controlled responses and reactions. It worked perfectly for the viewpoint of the social engineers who can pretty much direct public opinion and response in any way they want using the media and nudge units.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I hope others saw it as you did.
What I did do was refuse to be intimidated or beg forgiveness after being accused of a supposedly dreadful insult, which I did not make in the first place.
That was a tactic used before against myself (and others), and is a classic example of controlling behaviour.

My blunt refusal to be so controlled then brought the whole matter to a head, and I suppose it will never be resolved.
Well it's their loss as far as I'm concerned.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ElfsborgAddick and Smudger603
lardiman said:
Thanks. I hope others saw it as you did.
What I did do was refuse to be intimidated or beg forgiveness after being accused of a supposedly dreadful insult, which I did not make in the first place.
That was a tactic used before against myself (and others), and is a classic example of controlling behaviour.

My blunt refusal to be so controlled then brought the whole matter to a head, and I suppose it will never be resolved.
Well it's their loss as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...
He's got issues.
 
During all of our time as members on ITTV only one of us ever called out threats of violence posted there.
And it wasn't him.

I don't know whether those occasional threats against unpopular people within CAFC have ceased since I left.
I hope they have.
But if more have been posted, has anybody else ever stood up and said they are not acceptable?

The reaction against me when I did so would certainly not encourage anybody else to speak up.
A culture of violence, discrimination, and the consequences it eventually leads to, is enabled because people of good conscience remain silent.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back