I'm glad you posted that - I was just about to ask: What if the result of AA's 'branding' was followed, as you speculate, by the dropping of 'Hull'? Then, following that, the mutation into a franchise? That franchise could then be sold - as 'Tigers' or whatever - because, as he is very fond of reminding us, AA is a businessman and football is merely/purely a business. I thought I was having paranoid fantasies but then I realised there are at least two of us who think this way.
When Mr. Allam came, he said he was going to run the club as a business and not a football club. No one whinged then. In fact every was rather pleased about it. Now he's doing just that, and on the back of a business decision, everyone suddenly wants to be run as a football club now. Why didn't you just make noise when he was planning the takeover and put him off it from the start?
I'm pretty sure he never starting making his 'business' comments until a while after taking over. In fact we didn't hear much from him at all in the very early days did we? We actually spent a bit of money in the January immediately after he came and it was the year or so after that that we stopped spending money on the pitch and started sacking everyone off the pitch.
What's that supposed to mean? I'm somehow '******ed' because I care about an integral part of my club being changed by some mad **** with a God complex? Then you clearly care about the name, which makes your crassness towards your fellow Hull City Association Football Club fans even more backwards.
