The handcart to hell is still on target

No Sir, No Sir even if my sacks are full!

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47287048

 

I think we’ve reached peak snowflake

 

Burberry have released the go ****ing kill yourself hoody .

https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-47302587

 

"Let's not forget about the horrifying history of lynching either," she added.

Because you can't go into full-on snowflake entitled meltdown unless you relate it to negroes. That was the first thing I thought of when I saw the photos "wow, they are making fun of strange fruit, how insensitive"

 

*Negroes

 

*Knee Grows

 

*nig nogs

 

please log in to view this image

Now anti-vaxxers are refusing to vaccinate dogs in case they get dog autism

The effects of the human anti-vaccine movement are chilling, with preventable deaths from contagious illnesses such as measles being seen around the world. But a new movement, mirroring the human ‘anti-vaxxer’ brigade is spreading online – and persuading people not to vaccinate their dogs. Vets in America have seen declines in the number of dogs being vaccinated, as hoax articles and Facebook groups persuade the gullible that dog vaccines can cause autism or even cancer.

https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/25/now-anti-vaxxers-refusing-vaccinate-dogs-case-get-dog-autism-8733555/

 

That’s the name of Dev’s band

Dog Autism

 

22 February 2019

National Chair John Apter writes open letter to human rights organisation 'Liberty' following ill-informed comments on the use of spit guards.

On the 21stFebruary Liberty put out the following statement about the police roll out of spit guards.

“At least 30 police forces in England & Wales now use spit hoods. They are dangerous, degrading and unjustified. They have no place in the future of policing and must be relegated to the past.”

I responded to that statement offering Liberty to give an alternative to their use, attend a training session in their use and to have a discussion about their statement. Liberty has failed to respond to this request.

Therefore I feel I need to speak for the 120,000 dedicated police officers who I represent to bring some balance to your statement. To clarify there are far more than 30 forces using spit guards, almost every one of the 43 Home Office forces issue this equipment to their officers. Of those a handful only use them within their custody suites, the rest issue them to all their frontline officers.

Being spat at is a disgusting and vile act, many of those who do this will use their spit or blood as a weapon, that is the reality of what my colleagues have to deal with.

Prior to spit guards being issued, a person who was spitting or biting officers would either be put on the ground or restrained with their head forced down. The application of a spit guard uses less force and prevents the act of spiting or biting from continuing. Officers will always have to justify their use. Your blanket statement that spit guards must not be used offered no alternative, it would either be use more force or for the officer to allow themselves to be spat at or bitten.

I have heard some say that police officers should try to talk to the offender to prevent them from spitting or biting. I’m afraid the real world is not that simple and many of those individuals we deal with are violent and would use any opportunity to inflict harm on a police officer.

In your statement you claim that the use of spit guards are dangerous and can be attributed to a number of deaths. The examples you use are from the USA, where like Taser, spit guards are used in a very different way. The training given to officers ensures the detained persons safety is a priority.

The personal impact of being spat at or bitten must not be underestimated. There are many police officers who have to undertake intrusive anti-viral treatment as a result of being spat at or bitten. This impacts on them and their families. I am sure any reasonable person would say we must do all we can to prevent the need for this?

The statement you made about spit guards being dangerous and unjustified are sweeping and do not stand up to scrutiny. The act of spitting phlegm or blood, or biting an officer is degrading and disgusting. The police have a duty of care to protect the public and the use of spit guards does not just protect officers but also protects members of the public. My advice to those who don’t want to have a spit guard applied is don’t spit or bite, it’s quite simple.

My offer to Liberty stands, I would urge you to attend a training session where police officers are trained in the use of spit guards. Meet with me to discuss their use and meet officers who have been spat at and had to wait months to put their minds at rest. That is a genuine offer.

I stand by my support for the full roll out of spit guards to all police officers. This essential piece of equipment protects officers against those vile individuals. Their use is proportionate and safer than any alternative, it protects those who protect the public. They deserve this and your flawed and biased opinion gives no credible alternative.

 

Anyone else not read this ^^^?

 

I read it. Five O telling tree huggers to get to f.uck and not complain about officers putting spit hoods on scumbags.

 

Lol

 

How it feels to have 'millennial burnout'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/c384d54a-0116-437f-83e8-ddbca65b6c06

 

We deserved Brexit tbh

 

They have feelings too ffs. They can't all be stoned wasters.

 

"errand paralysis"

Doing mundane errands is exactly the time you get to "switch off".

Am guessing burned out millennials are a bit whiffy cos they find it impossible to take the time to take a ****in shower*.

*NB: showers are dangerous, more dangerous than terrorists.

 

They don't have the time to have feelings, apparently. Too busy being 24/7.