1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The GB Are No Happy

Discussion in 'Celtic' started by The Raging Oxter, Aug 5, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. eric cartman

    eric cartman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    77
    Bag of ****e. The police wasted millions bringing in a new law to get them which failed, and now they are going after them because they stand at a football ground.
     
    #21
  2. Big Audio Dynamite

    Big Audio Dynamite Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2012
    Messages:
    4,756
    Likes Received:
    1,436
    <laugh>.
     
    #22
  3. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    I honestly don't see what else the club could have done.

    How many meetings does it take before someone realises the GB (or section 111) have no intention of playing ball and actually doing as they have been asked?

    They have been told several times that they have to behave and all they have done is ask for more meetings, to what end? So they could argue the toss again as they are doing now?

    I would only send a petulant child to the naughty step so many times before I skelped their arses. They have been warned, they have not learned.
     
    #23
  4. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    There was a bit of give and take here. The club sat on its hands when Celtic supporters were targeted by the police under failed legislation. Worse. they actively facilitated it and stood against supporters in failed prosecutions.

    A few weeks ago Hull city supported their fans. Celtic did nothing like that. It isn't a one way street.

    It is a different approach, but actually backing our world renowned support is definitely something the club could have done. We give you this, you show us your commitment.

    If the problems are down to overcrowding of the area, steward the place better.
     
    #24
  5. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    So do you believe the GB when they claim that they are being actively targeted by Celtic for some reason? This makes no sense to me whatsoever, why would Celtic disenfranchise their customers and at the same time return money they have already received?

    If there is some plan afoot at Parkhead to force these people away then I don't see the logic behind it. In fact it would be utter madness, therefore we can rule out any such hidden agenda. I simply refuse to believe what the GB are telling their fellow fans.
     
    #25
  6. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    The GB are grown men rebs. Those who hang about them are too. They were told to stop the overcrowding and lateral movement and didnt. They were warned several times. They shouldnt have to enter into dialogue with the club about concessions or agreements to stop that and stop causing damage, its common sence to do it (or not do it)
     
    #26

  7. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I believe the GB area are making it easy for themselves to be targeted and the club are obliging. I do think they have an agenda against them and it is part of the process of 'sanitising' the support to reflect their vision of the club.

    It is about controlling them.

    I posted the podcast from Steve Cairney, formerly a delegate with the affilliation of Celtic supporters clubs. I remember what he said and I have no reason to disbelieve him. The club very much has an agenda against them.
     
    #27
  8. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    They also can't legislate for things that are not necessarily their fault. They can't be blamed for the overcrowding can they?

    I accept the lateral movement thing is not smart, but I think it is a red heron.









    That was a mood lightening malapropism.
     
    #28
  9. A.L.D.O 4.1

    A.L.D.O 4.1 1 of the top defendants in Europe

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2013
    Messages:
    55,392
    Likes Received:
    30,578
    Wasn't it the club who set aside section 111 for the Green Brigade ?
     
    #29
  10. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    What they cant tell lads not from their section to **** off at the games or put out a statement out asking/telling others to stay away? They did nothing to stop it
     
    #30
  11. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    If you support the GB in their "cause" then I'm sorry, you are acting like them! No one is bigger than the club...as far as I'm concerned these "ultras" <doh> need to grow the **** up. They were warned, they failed to listen, so **** them. Acting like belligerent arseholes.
     
    #31
  12. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    And asking Celtic for them to control the tickets for "their" section <doh> ...arrogant ****ers!
     
    #32
  13. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    They continually do things they shouldnt/they know are wrong, hell they are told its wrong. Yet do nothing to stop it. The things they do get celtic in trouble. They msy seem petty but the club have to take action or theyll lose their safety cert. Its not sn agenda. They bring it on themselves
     
    #33
  14. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    Agendas <doh> Celtic PLC have a duty to serve all supporters...not overgrown neds in section 111
     
    #34
  15. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I don't know they did nothing to stop it.

    They are fans, not stewards. They asked for no pyro, yet got the blame when there were bangers.
     
    #35
  16. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    The agenda was made clear my Steve Cairney. I have no reason to believe he is making it up.

    On balance, I would tend to believe him ahead of the club and ahead of the GB.
     
    #36
  17. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I don't think that helps.
     
    #37
  18. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I don't know they haven't

    I don't know they don't do it at games.
     
    #38
  19. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    <doh>
    Arseholes!
     
    #39
  20. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    You don't think what helps?
     
    #40
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page