The Gays

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Blackheath Redcoat said:
But you haven't provided the link. All you've done is refer, in the vaguest possible terms, to a "study". Can you please provide a link. I'm becoming increasingly doubtful that you can.

OK.... a couple of points here. Firstly, the whole basis of this discussion is the <ahem> "study" referred to. It is therefore incumbent on the person using it as a basis for their argument to provide the evidence to support it.

Secondly, I didn't say I wanted to discredit it, I said I wanted to read it so I could make my own mind up. That is a reasonable thing to want to do and doesn't in any way imply bias. If you provide a link, the grown ups on here will be able to read it and make comments based on an informed opinion. That's what grown ups do.

The way this is going though, your evasiveness is increasingly suggestive of somebody who is talking through their arse and making up bogus "research" claims to support an anti-gay stance. I hope that's not the case, but it's increasingly looking like that.

Please.... don't introduce any more Straw Men into the discussion, simply provide a link. If you have the report - as you say you have - it should be an easy thing to do.
Click to expand...


Don't waste any time on him, he constantly makes up facts to suit whatever crackpot pish he's spouting. He'll perhaps eventually post a link, whose subject bears little if any relation to his understanding of it.
 
Fan's Avatar looks like it's been caught smuggling music and Lynx deodorant and beheaded under Islamic law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back