The Eurasian Negroid race and the EU

Coming to a City near you .

 

Most of the words in that video sound like they're been lifted from a 1920s American eugenics book. Anyway, I hope your yellow-pink children are doing good.

 

They are all excellent at mathematics

 

The producer needs to get his facts right and watch more shows on the BBC. According to their programmes there have been black people in Britain for thousands of years. You don't get a historical drama these days without somebody black turning up and not as slaves, servants, merchants, sailors etc but as pillars of the community and everyday passers by. According to Doctor Who there have been West Indians strolling about London since Shakespeare was in shorts.

Coffee coloured children by the score indeed.

 

There have been you thick mutant.

 

I looked at BBCi player last night to see if there was anything funny .

The level of shoehorning terrible diversity shows is now off the charts.
A program called Famalam particularly stood out.

 

Just put on Famalan 1st scene before the credits is a racism gag about black people being killed in movies first.
Then 2 more racial stereotype sketches straight off the bat, I wonder when angry African mum will make a hilarious appearance?

 

The next Robin Hood movie is to have a black Will Scarlett.

 

You thick racist mutant Robin Hood probably was black .

 

I listened to an interview

You'll love this deluded chap then

http://www.londonlive.co.uk/news/2016-12-13/africans-in-london-the-black-tudors-tour-blackamoors-

After 20 painstaking years the author of the book this tour is based on found 37 records of Africans in a London parish. I know, 37!! Wow.

I love the maths too, this somehow equates to 1 in 20 people being African in London during Tudor times (?). So there wasn't half a million people living in London during Tudor times, only 740?

The Blackamoor tour of London (it takes about 2 minutes to walk from one church to another) also proves (not suggests, but actually proves) that during this period not all Africans in London were slaves or servants but wealthy merchants, lawyers, Doctors and the like. Our very own and very first black middle class 500 years ago, who'd have thought it eh?

And for all you Northernists don't think that it was only London teeming with darkies back then, apparently there is historical proof that Africans were all over the place and it is only racist white historians that have refused to acknowledge the presence and importance of our colonial cousins going back as far as the Romans.

 

There were Syrians manning Hadrian's wall in Roman times, Mediteranean merchants trading with peeps in Cornwall before then, etc...

 

By the time Emperor Hadrian (confirmed buftie by the way) was building his wall to keep the mental northerners out the Roman army comprised of almost entirely foreign troops. That has been well documented by historians for donkeys years.

The idea that Tudor London society was awash with professional Africans is lunacy and just one more example of black people today trying to justify their sense of entitlement by planting their 'roots' as far back in English history as possible. There were no black people in significant numbers until after WW2. The error in the OP YouTube clip was to suggest that by the time of Whiter Shade of Pale your average Londoner was getting along famously with immigrants. Forgot to mention the Race Riots in Notting Hill, no mention of the persecution of Huguenots when the first refugees from France arrived and not a sausage about our treatment/massacre of Jews.

Let us not forget that Black Lives Matter but as far as Britain is concerned they haven't mattered in any great numbers since the 1950's.

 

How do you know?

 

1. Most people who've ruled England have been bufties, most notably William of Orange, a well known passion fruit.

2. I don't think it's black people who are engaging in historical revisionism. It's more likely the liberal poofs who work at places like the BBC.

3. Charles Lindbergh was right about the Jews.

 

It all started back in the Stone Age where primitive man would paint images on the walls depicting hunting scenes. The belief is that these were meant to bring good fortune and a bountiful hunt. Stone Age man also carved images which were worshipped and used in storytelling. As man developed language skills throughout history the use of symbols to depict specific meanings became more common, at first this was thought to be started with counting. The development of cultures and civilizations over the millennia in particular Persia and North Africa culminated in a detailed and highly organized use of symbols or hieroglyphs. The ancient Egyptians carved these into stone, then later clay tablets and eventually on papyrus, a crude form of paper.

Over the next few thousand years the use of commonly understood languages and writing became widespread and largely due to the need to produce texts of religious instruction printing on an industrial scale started. Civilizations with their own language and history started to document events for future generations to understand.

This invention was called Books.

Have a go at reading one every now and again.

 

please log in to view this image

The Dickhead Tribe of Mesopotamia were my favourite.

 

Angina attack down Govanhill way

 

Your 'proof' is one book written by some nobody?

Well done