The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Watford_R said:
I'll pretend this isn't the rant of a lunatic.

How else do you want minorities to live? Should a Polish bloke not buy a house because there's already a Polish bloke on the street?

Funny that you bring Muslims into it. I didn't.
Click to expand...

Call me names as much as you want, it still doesn't explain why you have an inability to ever answer anything I put to you.

Crazy idea, but how about they don't all congregate into one area, that would be a start. Oh wait, but then they would be integrating and we can't have that now can we?

Funny that you bring Poles into it. I didn't.
...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Watford_R said:
I thought he was eloquent in explaining Olney's stance on Article 50 and his explanations behind pushing for another referendum to give an indication of what sort of Brexit the public want. I think the Lib Dems in general have overdone it with the hollering about the Richmond result being any sort of indication of the general population's views on Brexit.

You not watching it despite posting it says more than anything else, however.
Click to expand...

Why do you keep trying to claim I didn't watch it? Don't you see how ridiculous a comment that is? <doh>
 
Watford_R said:
I thought he was eloquent in explaining Olney's stance on Article 50 and his explanations behind pushing for another referendum to give an indication of what sort of Brexit the public want. I think the Lib Dems in general have overdone it with the hollering about the Richmond result being any sort of indication of the general population's views on Brexit.

You not watching it despite posting it says more than anything else, however.
Click to expand...

Expect more evasive bollocks....any moment now!...
 
The Zlatan said:
Call me names as much as you want, it still doesn't explain why you have an inability to ever answer anything I put to you.

Crazy idea, but how about they don't all congregate into one area, that would be a start. Oh wait, but then they would be integrating and we can't have that now can we?

Funny that you bring Poles into it. I didn't.
...
Click to expand...

Poles are a good example of a minority who have mixed well.

Do you want integration? Like I said earlier, people complain when their all white town has a few dark faces but they complain when minorities become clusters. Integration is a good thing IMO and it tends to happen with time once new groups are settled here and become more prosperous.
 
Watford_R said:
Poles are a good example of a minority who have mixed well.

Do you want integration? Like I said earlier, people complain when their all white town has a few dark faces but they complain when minorities become clusters. Integration is a good thing IMO and it tends to happen with time once new groups are settled here and become more prosperous.
Click to expand...
He's not arsed about the Poles, as they're primarily honkies

It's the brown faces he has an issue with.
 
Watford_R said:
I was trying to think of a good reason you've still not commented on it. Apart from you being intentionally evasive there isn't another.
Click to expand...

You'd have been wrong on that too. <doh>

Do you not think think Neil popped his basic premise that they were the only ones being clear, and the others not stating their case, when clip after clip and the framework document clearly showed he was spouting crap and his own position was vague, unworkable and amounted to remain and he never mentioned a second referendum before the vote, in fact he said it was a 'once in a generation vote'.

The Richmond result was a vastly reduced number of people supporting remain compared to the referendum, which points to people stating clearly they want out, not the half arsed nothing he's spouting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
Watford_R said:
Poles are a good example of a minority who have mixed well.

Do you want integration? Like I said earlier, people complain when their all white town has a few dark faces but they complain when minorities become clusters. Integration is a good thing IMO and it tends to happen with time once new groups are settled here and become more prosperous.
Click to expand...

Which is what Labour and the campaign for racial equality clearly say was a failing of their policy, and the reason it has and will continue to fail and why far greater controls are needed.
 
DMD said:
Which is what Labour and the campaign for racial equality clearly say was a failing of their policy, and the reason it has and will continue to fail and why far greater controls are needed.
Click to expand...

It's how most minorities in just about every country start out. Halving the number of people coming in won't change that IMO.
 
Watford_R said:
Poles are a good example of a minority who have mixed well.

Do you want integration? Like I said earlier, people complain when their all white town has a few dark faces but they complain when minorities become clusters. Integration is a good thing IMO and it tends to happen with time once new groups are settled here and become more prosperous.
Click to expand...
And Muslims are a good example of a minority who haven't.

I was being sarcastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Watford_R said:
It's how most minorities in just about every country start out. Halving the number of people coming in won't change that IMO.
Click to expand...

Then you're in disagreement with the people that studied it, and were wholly involved in creating it. <ok>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back