The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
No what I said at all. Unless you can't understand that inflation will increase due to the simple maths at play, then you'll have dropped yourself in that category yourself ;)

I am perfectly capable of understanding inflation and the effects of inflation. I did not and will not say that the inflation fears have gone away or it's unlikely to start to rise sooner rather than later. What I said, for me, every month that is better than expected will be considered as a small victory.
You can dress it up however you see fit, I personally think it's a good news day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Prime Minister
He does and he thinks you are a twat.

How is your blood pressure today, is it stable again or still running high?

I ask who's Victor Meldue, and you reply with "He does and he thinks you are a twat"

<laugh>

What was that about blood pressure again? I think your fat fingers are typing in rage without having read the post you're replying to properly, red mist and all that.

Anyway the caravan club, white's only in your chapter is it?
 
I am perfectly capable of understanding inflation and the effects of inflation. I did not and will not say that the inflation fears have gone away or it's unlikely to start to rise sooner rather than later. What I said, for me, every month that is better than expected will be considered as a small victory.
You can dress it up however you see fit, I personally think it's a good news day.

If you understand the FACT that inflation increasing due to the currency slide isn't in doubt, then why is today a 'victory'? It's increasing at a higher rate than it was doing before June and is only 0.2% off the prediction, all that it means is that the pain currently resides in the supply chain. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
If you understand the FACT that inflation increasing due to the currency slide isn't in doubt, then why is today a 'victory'? It's increasing at a higher rate than it was doing before June and is only 0.2% off the prediction, all that it means is that the pain currently resides in the supply chain. Nothing more, nothing less.

Is the fact that we did better than forecasted, not a positive? Is the fact that manufacturing are looking at other initiatives to offset inflationary pressures, not a positive? Is the fact that the markets have reacted favourably, not a positive? Has the fact that us, the public, are not seeing the expected rises at the till yet, so keeping a few more pennies in our pocket, not a positive.
Maybe, in the grand scheme not much to write home about, but a small victory today.
But obviously I will bow to your superior knowledge around manufacturing and economics.
 
I was pointing out the hypocrisy but you didnt seem interested
you wanted to concentrate on how bad you thought he was but there was a different attitude when clinton was accused of criminality
you are doing it again with the wife beating - you make out he is guilty but not even charged
Bannon was charged with domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness. His wife didn't turn up to court.
His lawyer denied accusations that he'd threatened her to get her to stay away, but couldn't vouch for his client.
He admitted phoning her to tell her that it was ok to come back afterwards, though. Coincidence, clearly.

Comparing that with Clinton is asinine.
She was investigated and cleared repeatedly.
He was investigated, charged and intimated the witness into not attending.
Not even close.
 
Glenn Beck is a right-wing, conservative, religious lunatic.
He peddled loads of conspiracy theories, hated Obama and ranted endlessly about Democrats and Liberals.
He thinks that Steve Bannon's too right wing and mental! <laugh>

You must log in or register to see media

Apparently Beck had some sort of brain disorder that meant that he couldn't sleep properly.
It lead to him believing a bunch of nonsense and slipping into delusions.
Since he was cured of it, he's become a lot less right-wing.

Any posters on here having problems sleeping? <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
I ask who's Victor Meldue, and you reply with "He does and he thinks you are a twat"

<laugh>

What was that about blood pressure again? I think your fat fingers are typing in rage without having read the post you're replying to properly, red mist and all that.

Anyway the caravan club, white's only in your chapter is it?

My blood pressure is spot on, unlike yours, dam predictive type is a P.I.T.A. at times

My chapter, as you put would not allow ill looking people like you in, who would want a runt of a bloke on the verge of having a heart attack near them.
 
My blood pressure is spot on, unlike yours, dam predictive type is a P.I.T.A. at times

My chapter, as you put would not allow ill looking people like you in, who would want a runt of a bloke on the verge of having a heart attack near them.

How can predictive text be the excuse for a totally nonsensical retort?

ill looking? I'm as fit as a flea. Don't worry though Kustard, your wobbly box, whites only, Kiddie Klan is safe from me, as I don't class parking in a field, watching an undersized tele and ****ting in a glorified bucket as entertaining travel.
 
Bannon was charged with domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness. His wife didn't turn up to court.
His lawyer denied accusations that he'd threatened her to get her to stay away, but couldn't vouch for his client.
He admitted phoning her to tell her that it was ok to come back afterwards, though. Coincidence, clearly.

Comparing that with Clinton is asinine.
She was investigated and cleared repeatedly.
He was investigated, charged and intimated the witness into not attending.
Not even close.

Has he been found guilty of intimidating a witness? No.
Has he been found guilty of domestic violence/battery? No.

It looks like you are trying to pass off accusations as proof of guilt.
 
Has he been found guilty of intimidating a witness? No.
Has he been found guilty of domestic violence/battery? No.

It looks like you are trying to pass off accusations as proof of guilt.
His lawyer's statements indicate his guilt, as do his wife's actions.
The thing that he's been accused of is intentionally avoiding a guilty verdict by committing another crime.
Combine that with the police report and he looks very, very guilty.
Believe what you want, though.

His professional actions are what people should be worried about. He's a nut.
Trump seems to get most of his information from lunatics like him though, so it's hardly a surprise.
Alex Jones is due an interview, apparently. The man who claimed that Clinton was literally a demon...
 
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images

America isn't a meritocracy anymore, affirmative action proves this.

Yes, those groups are more likely to be killed by law enforcement because they are responsible for more crime.

Poverty rates are coming down yet crime rates are going up.
 
His lawyer's statements indicate his guilt, as do his wife's actions.
The thing that he's been accused of is intentionally avoiding a guilty verdict by committing another crime.
Combine that with the police report and he looks very, very guilty.
Believe what you want, though.

His professional actions are what people should be worried about. He's a nut.
Trump seems to get most of his information from lunatics like him though, so it's hardly a surprise.
Alex Jones is due an interview, apparently. The man who claimed that Clinton was literally a demon...

I thought we shouldn't claim guilt when NONE has been proven? That you choose to believe accusations to be proof of guilt in this instance, pretty much makes a mockery of your Clinton defence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
http://distractify.com/news/2016/11/11/safety-pin-solidarity

See this is what I am talking about. What utter bullshit.
First of all it is assuming that everyone who voted Trump is racist or homophobic, and that now, the minorities will need a way to identify the good white people from the bad ones. Its ****ing crazy.
This is a good response to that article.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...s-are-embarassing_us_58278b9de4b02b1f5257a36a
Seen anyone in the UK wearing a safety pin? No, me neither.

As for Trump voters all being racist or sexist, clearly not.
He obviously is both, though. Some people see voting for someone like that as endorsing his ****ty opinions.
Not the way to deal with it, in my opinion. I can understand why people are worried, though.
 
I thought we shouldn't claim guilt when NONE has been proven? That you choose to believe accusations to be proof of guilt in this instance, pretty much makes a mockery of your Clinton defence.
Are the situations the same? No?
Have you heard of nuance? No? Apparently not.

Robert Mugabe's an elected official. Theresa May is an elected official.
I can't criticise the former without also criticising the latter, according to your strange viewpoint.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.