The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
And which one of them do you think relates to Russia and Putin?
I don't see anything that backs your thinking.
You said: "He's banged on about Russia endlessly, even when it's not relevant to the conversation.
His admiration for Putin is completely open and fawning.
How have you missed this stuff? It's been all over the media for months."
Yet it's not even in his top ten policies
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
I'm actually quite optimistic about Trump tbh PNP, but not for the reasons many think, and certainly not for most of the 10 points (iirc) in that article of Pete's. My optimism is based on his insular approach to the USA, which I hope will mean he'll leave the rest of the world, the **** alone. It's funny though, that the one thing which might just benefit his own people domestically, is the one policy he shares with Clinton <laugh>
He won't be able to leave the rest of the world alone. The guy has a hissy fit every time someone disagrees with him. He will go into "talk to the hand" mode with every other one of the major economies/countries before his tenure is up.

It's going to be a reality TV show! <laugh>
 
So you weren't trying to tar me as an alt right, anti-semitic, conspiracy theorist then. righty ho.

Your 'argument' thus far has been to attempt to dismiss the website that posted the claim that Soros is funding the groups behind the riots..
I've said that a lot of your sources have been alt-right, conspiracy nonsense, which they have.
The anti-Semitism tends to be commenters on those sites or thinly veiled jibes within articles, though.
You should expect it to be brought up if you keep using those ****ty sites as evidence for your arguments.

The links between Soros and the protests are quite vague and rather irrelevant.
His foundation has a budget of $930.7 million. I doubt he knows what it's all spent on.
Even if he were backing them himself, so what?
 
I've said that a lot of your sources have been alt-right, conspiracy nonsense, which they have.
The anti-Semitism tends to be commenters on those sites or thinly veiled jibes within articles, though.
You should expect it to be brought up if you keep using those ****ty sites as evidence for your arguments.

The links between Soros and the protests are quite vague and rather irrelevant.
His foundation has a budget of $930.7 million. I doubt he knows what it's all spent on.
Even if he were backing them himself, so what?
Soros is going to learn what RICO stands for pretty soon with a bit of luck.
 
I'm actually quite optimistic about Trump tbh PNP, but not for the reasons many think, and certainly not for most of the 10 points (iirc) in that article of Pete's. My optimism is based on his insular approach to the USA, which I hope will mean he'll leave the rest of the world, the **** alone. It's funny though, that the one thing which might just benefit his own people domestically, is the one policy he shares with Clinton <laugh>
He fights comedy writers on Twitter at 3am if they upset him.
He'll probably invade Panama if he has a bad cigar or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
You said: "He's banged on about Russia endlessly, even when it's not relevant to the conversation.
His admiration for Putin is completely open and fawning.
How have you missed this stuff? It's been all over the media for months."
Yet it's not even in his top ten policies
He's hardly going to have, "Kiss Putin's Arse", as one of his public policies, is he?
Have you actually missed him talking about the Russian dictator? How did that happen?
 
I've said that a lot of your sources have been alt-right, conspiracy nonsense, which they have.
The anti-Semitism tends to be commenters on those sites or thinly veiled jibes within articles, though.
You should expect it to be brought up if you keep using those ****ty sites as evidence for your arguments.

The links between Soros and the protests are quite vague and rather irrelevant.
His foundation has a budget of $930.7 million. I doubt he knows what it's all spent on.
Even if he were backing them himself, so what?

Ignoring the further alt right deflection bollocks, the highlighted sentence says enough.
 
You said: "He's banged on about Russia endlessly, even when it's not relevant to the conversation.
His admiration for Putin is completely open and fawning.
How have you missed this stuff? It's been all over the media for months."
Yet it's not even in his top ten policies

Soo @PleaseNotPoll does THAT answer your question about why Pete feels that Trump will stop Putin's warmongering, as he claimed?
 
I'm saying that you shouldn't be fooled by the odd compliment
What do you have to go by in the contrary?
His campaign's links to Russia are clear, as is his admiration for a dictator.
Why do you think he's going to be confrontational with Putin?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Status
Not open for further replies.