The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
My claims about you have nothing to do with anyone else's comments.
I didn't rank you in terms of abuse, so other people posting it doesn't influence what I said.

You moaned about insults and abuse, while posting insults and abuse.
How does someone else posting abuse have anything to do with that?
I know you didn't rank me in terms of abuse. That's the whole point. You didn't want to rank people because there were plenty of people you want to ingratiate yourself to that would have come higher than me in any ranking.
 
I know you didn't rank me in terms of abuse. That's the whole point. You didn't want to rank people because there were plenty of people you want to ingratiate yourself to that would have come higher than me in any ranking.
That's simply not true and it's easy to demonstrate it, too.
Tobes and Stan have abused you a lot on this thread and I expect that they'll continue to do so.
I'll put them at 1 and 2, if you like. They'll see that as a badge of honour! <laugh>

There's loads of abuse on this thread, as I've pointed out already.
I don't think that anyone's denying that, are they?
The difference is that some people are dishing it out, while moaning about it when other do it.
That's hypocrisy, isn't it?
 
That's simply not true and it's easy to demonstrate it, too.
Tobes and Stan have abused you a lot on this thread and I expect that they'll continue to do so.
I'll put them at 1 and 2, if you like. They'll see that as a badge of honour! <laugh>

There's loads of abuse on this thread, as I've pointed out already.
I don't think that anyone's denying that, are they?
The difference is that some people are dishing it out, while moaning about it when other do it.
That's hypocrisy, isn't it?
I don't think it should count towards ranking points if the fat **** can't see the abuse. :emoticon-0183-swear <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
I like to think of my comments as being 'descriptive'. Sometimes the truth hurts - not that you would recognise the truth even if it wore one of your wife's dog collars and begged you to rub its tummy, Walter. :emoticon-0136-giggl

You'd like to think lots of things, office boy. Unfortunately, for you, none of them are true. As has been pointed out to you.

You're just another sad little failure blaming everyone else for your own sad little Life.

Enjoy your cattle truck commute!...
 
I don't think it should count towards ranking points if the fat **** can't see the abuse. :emoticon-0183-swear <whistle>
I did ask earlier how he was ranking those on ignore, but I think he just counts them at the top.
It's another Trump trait that he shares, in my opinion.
Everyone else is a horrible, nasty, vindictive person for disagreeing and they deserve the insults that they get, so they don't count.
 
You'd like to think lots of things, office boy. Unfortunately, for you, none of them are true. As has been pointed out to you.

You're just another sad little failure blaming everyone else for your own sad little Life.

Enjoy your cattle truck commute!...

It's not worth biting Spain, you can tell that by the way he insults others family members he is a ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
That's simply not true and it's easy to demonstrate it, too.
Tobes and Stan have abused you a lot on this thread and I expect that they'll continue to do so.
I'll put them at 1 and 2, if you like. They'll see that as a badge of honour! <laugh>

There's loads of abuse on this thread, as I've pointed out already.
I don't think that anyone's denying that, are they?
The difference is that some people are dishing it out, while moaning about it when other do it.
That's hypocrisy, isn't it?
My complaint is against mindless abuse. Whenever I am critical I can explain what I am critical about. I never say "You XXXX" or "You XXXX".
You seem to be saying that I am acting exactly like these people who hurl mindless abuse. I maintain I do not and that is why I am not hypocritical. If I acted like you I would be accusing you of abuse by you making out I am an hypocrite. I dont think that was abuse, it was more an incorrect analysis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Prime Minister
My complaint is against mindless abuse. Whenever I am critical I can explain what I am critical about. I never say "You XXXX" or "You XXXX".
You seem to be saying that I am acting exactly like these people who hurl mindless abuse. I maintain I do not and that is why I am not hypocritical. If I acted like you I would be accusing you of abuse by you making out I am an hypocrite. I dont think that was abuse, it was more an incorrect analysis.
You called me a leftist remoaner that hates the truth.
To attempt to raise that above mindless abuse is beyond trivial, I'm afraid.
 
I did ask earlier how he was ranking those on ignore, but I think he just counts them at the top.
It's another Trump trait that he shares, in my opinion.
Everyone else is a horrible, nasty, vindictive person for disagreeing and they deserve the insults that they get, so they don't count.
Why do you talk rubbish so often? I have not accused anybody of being "horrible, nasty or vindictive" when they disagree. If you think so then give one example (cue: dodging of request). I have explained that they hurl mindless abuse. If I disagree with somebody I explain why. You are simply wrong if you say something you can't support and then try to equate reasoned argument with mindless abuse.
 
Why do you talk rubbish so often? I have not accused anybody of being "horrible, nasty or vindictive" when they disagree. If you think so then give one example (cue: dodging of request). I have explained that they hurl mindless abuse. If I disagree with somebody I explain why. You are simply wrong if you say something you can't support and then try to equate reasoned argument with mindless abuse.
I didn't say that you'd called anyone horrible, nasty or vindictive, I explained your mindset.
You handily backed me up by posting almost the exact same thing in your next post.
You believe that explaining why you're abusing someone absolves you of that abuse, which is what I said you were thinking.
They're against you and that makes it okay to call them whatever you want, so it's not really abuse.
Are you leftist?
Are you a remoaner?
Didn't you see that you couldn't tell the truth and answer the question so you refused to answer the question?
And there you go. Exactly what I said.

I told the truth, as I've explained already. I don't know who's dished out the most abuse, nor do I care.
That's the most honest answer available. Yours isn't, by your own admission.
You haven't seen a bunch of posts, as you have people on ignore, but you're sure that they're worse than you are.
That's dishonest.
 
I like to think of my comments as being 'descriptive'. Sometimes the truth hurts - not that you would recognise the truth even if it wore one of your wife's dog collars and begged you to rub its tummy, Walter. :emoticon-0136-giggl
I wouldn't call your comments descriptive. They are indicative of the state of how your tiny mind works although works is probably stretching the point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
My complaint is against mindless abuse. Whenever I am critical I can explain what I am critical about. I never say "You XXXX" or "You XXXX".
You seem to be saying that I am acting exactly like these people who hurl mindless abuse. I maintain I do not and that is why I am not hypocritical. If I acted like you I would be accusing you of abuse by you making out I am an hypocrite. I dont think that was abuse, it was more an incorrect analysis.
You XXXX
 
You said: “Everyone else is a horrible, nasty, vindictive person for disagreeing and they deserve the insults that they get, so they don't count.”
Is that supposed to be my way of thinking? If so, is there anything to support that at all?
Can you show an example of me insulting somebody because they disagreed with me?
You seem to think that because some people hurl mindless abuse that you should accuse everybody who isn’t upset about leaving the EU of exactly the same whether it is the same or not.
 
You said: “Everyone else is a horrible, nasty, vindictive person for disagreeing and they deserve the insults that they get, so they don't count.”
Is that supposed to be my way of thinking? If so, is there anything to support that at all?
Can you show an example of me insulting somebody because they disagreed with me?
You seem to think that because some people hurl mindless abuse that you should accuse everybody who isn’t upset about leaving the EU of exactly the same whether it is the same or not.
You insult everyone that disagrees with you. I already quoted you doing it to me.
There are several people on here that voted Leave, but who haven't engaged in abuse or hypocrisy.

You must log in or register to see images
 
Accepted you don't use the language of some, but your insults towards people are no different. If you can't see or understand that, you really are beyond help.
Absolutely.
Well said. Not using bad language in your abuse does not change the tone or purpose.
Petes methods are particularly nasty and unnecessary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.