The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
So why mention something that has nothing to do with the UK, you have hotels in the ME that only accept Muslims, in fact you cant enter Mecca unless you are one.
It was a hypothetical about UK businesses, to show why we have discrimination laws.
I'm assuming that Mecca doesn't have them. Would that be accurate?
Should we be more like Mecca?
 
Gosh. What a super sleuth. You do realise it's a tad bigoted and prejudiced to dismiss opinions due to your narrow minded beliefs, don't you?

It's not bigoted or prejudiced to dismiss just about every source you ever quote, not even a tad. It's common sense, & saves a lot of time <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: NSIS
Wahay, an appeal to others. You're floundering badly here.
It's not an appeal to others, which isn't even a fallacy.
It's a demonstration of what you're doing, which is obvious to everyone, barring maybe Kustard.
 
Are you responding to some other thread?
Now you're attempting to copy answers that I've given to you, earlier in this thread! <laugh>

You offered two comments as examples of me claiming something.
Neither of them contained that claim. Would you like to try again?
 
Right, so me mentioning the lass in question is diversion, you inventing the KKK hotel chain is not.

Righty ho. <ok>
Actually, you inventing the KKK hotel chain is a diversion.
Trying to claim that there was some disagreement about whether the girl should've served the alcohol was another.
 
Now you're attempting to copy answers that I've given to you, earlier in this thread! <laugh>

You offered two comments as examples of me claiming something.
Neither of them contained that claim. Would you like to try again?

I'll stick with what I put. It answers it well enough, but no doubt you'll invent some scenario to rewrite it. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
I'll stick with what I put. It answers it well enough, but no doubt you'll invent some scenario to rewrite it. :emoticon-0105-wink:
More projection.
Nope, YOU invented the kkk chain.
And more nonsense.

Do you really think that you're fooling anyone with this act? It's embarrassing.
Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.
 
More projection.

And more nonsense.

Do you really think that you're fooling anyone with this act? It's embarrassing.
Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

I don't think you're a full shilling. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

You invented the KKK hotel chain when you couldn't find anything to make your question look less ridiculous. You've done well, you've managed to make you and your question look totally pathetic, and your attempts at denial are adding to it.

It's not boring, it's as funny as **** watching you trying to wriggle your way out of it. You nearly managed it when you admitted it was hypothetical, but then you managed to carry on digging, and digging.

You'd be better off just holding your hands up and admitting it was a stupid point, but I bet you can't bring yourself to do that.

I bet the hypocritical wee lass wishes she'd just sold him the drink now. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
I don't think you're a full shilling. :emoticon-0102-bigsm

You invented the KKK hotel chain when you couldn't find anything to make your question look less ridiculous. You've done well, you've managed to make you and your question look totally pathetic, and your attempts at denial are adding to it.

It's not boring, it's as funny as **** watching you trying to wriggle your way out of it. You nearly managed it when you admitted it was hypothetical, but then you managed to carry on digging, and digging.

You'd be better off just holding your hands up and admitting it was a stupid point, but I bet you can't bring yourself to do that.

I bet the hypocritical wee lass wishes she'd just sold him the drink now. :emoticon-0102-bigsm
This delusional summary was brought to you by DMD, The Bringer of Peace™.
Right, so it seems we're all in agreement about many, many things, which is progress.

It just needs the childish sniping to stop and maybe, after three threads, a discussion can finally take place rather than some playground level adversarial challenges.

I doubt it will happen, as we've been here before, but I am an eternal optimist, so let's see how it goes.
Wow, it's almost as if you're an enormous hypocrite with no grasp on reality, isn't it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.